1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-081x(199705)18:4<279::aid-bdd989>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Liposomal Encapsulated Ampicillin in Male and Female Rats

Abstract: The dispositions of free and liposomal entrapped ampicillin were compared in male and female rats after IV administration. Serial blood samples were collected for 2 h in the free drug study and 12 h for the liposomal formulation. Pharmacokinetic parameters obtained with free drug were not significantly different between genders. However, gender significantly influenced the disposition of liposomal encapsulated ampicillin. While no difference was observed in distribution t1/2 between genders, female rats had a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with those of Toutain and colleagues (1997), who reported a significant influence of sex on ivermectin and doramectin pharmacokinetic parameters in cattle. Information on possible influence of sex in the pharmacokinetics of endectocides is lacking in sheep, although for some drugs significant differences have been demonstrated in animals (Lamiable et al, 1991;Pardue and White, 1997;Toutain et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These results are in agreement with those of Toutain and colleagues (1997), who reported a significant influence of sex on ivermectin and doramectin pharmacokinetic parameters in cattle. Information on possible influence of sex in the pharmacokinetics of endectocides is lacking in sheep, although for some drugs significant differences have been demonstrated in animals (Lamiable et al, 1991;Pardue and White, 1997;Toutain et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%