2009
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacodynamic assessment of platelet inhibition by prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial

Abstract: The TRITON-TIMI 38 platelet substudy shows that prasugrel results in greater inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet function in ACS patients than clopidogrel, supporting the hypothesis that greater platelet inhibition leads to a lower incidence of ischaemic events and more bleeding both early and late following PCI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
141
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
141
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, we expected that additional administration of 30 mg of prasugrel in HTPR patients who had received a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel would decrease PRI to a value comparable with that observed in clopidogrel-naive patients after treatment with a 60 mg loading dose of prasugrel (34.3 ± 23.1%) [19]. Additionally, we anticipated in our prasugrel-treated patients to obtain PRI values at 30 days comparable to these observed in the TRITON-TIMI 38 platelet substudy at this time point (33.6 ± 2.9%) [20]. Bearing in mind these results and assuming a 2-sided alpha value of 0.05, we calculated, using the t-test for dependent variables, that enrolment of 46 HTPR patients would provide a 99.9% power to demonstrate significant reductions in PRI associated with the implementation of prasugrel-based antiplatelet regimen between its baseline value and both values at 24 h and 30 days.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis and Sample Size Calculationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Similarly, we expected that additional administration of 30 mg of prasugrel in HTPR patients who had received a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel would decrease PRI to a value comparable with that observed in clopidogrel-naive patients after treatment with a 60 mg loading dose of prasugrel (34.3 ± 23.1%) [19]. Additionally, we anticipated in our prasugrel-treated patients to obtain PRI values at 30 days comparable to these observed in the TRITON-TIMI 38 platelet substudy at this time point (33.6 ± 2.9%) [20]. Bearing in mind these results and assuming a 2-sided alpha value of 0.05, we calculated, using the t-test for dependent variables, that enrolment of 46 HTPR patients would provide a 99.9% power to demonstrate significant reductions in PRI associated with the implementation of prasugrel-based antiplatelet regimen between its baseline value and both values at 24 h and 30 days.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis and Sample Size Calculationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…(Prasugrel has a higher level of inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel and a more rapid onset of action. 55 Its metabolism is not affected by the 2C19 allele variant. 56 ).…”
Section: E34mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Вы-явление взаимосвязи между недостаточным ингиби-рованием ФАТ (ВОРТ) на фоне ААТ и неблагоприятными исходами (НС, ИМ, тромбозом стента) позволяет об-суждать вопрос о возможной модификации ААТ, исходя из показателей ФАТ [25,26]. Среди возможных вари-антов можно обсуждать увеличение дозы клопидогрела [27], либо его замену на другие блокаторы P2Y 12 ре-цепторов (тикагрелор или прасугрел) [28][29][30].…”
Section: Monitoring Of Antiplatelet Therapy In Patients With Ihd контunclassified