2015
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2014.989484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceutical HIV prevention technologies in the UK: six domains for social science research

Abstract: The development of pharmaceutical HIV prevention technologies (PPTs) over the last five years has generated intense interest from a range of stakeholders. There are concerns that these clinical and pharmaceutical interventions are proceeding with insufficient input of the social sciences. Hence key questions around implementation and evaluation remain unexplored whilst biomedical HIV prevention remains insufficiently critiqued or theorised from sociological as well as other social science perspectives. This pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they help us to understand how and why TasP can be explained differently in specific country contexts. Indeed, how systems, institutions and structures deal with the reframing of meanings and associations traditionally ascribed to HIV treatment that is increasingly seen as prevention is a key domain of enquiry for social sciences (Keogh & Dodds, 2015). In this regard, our findings illustrate the importance of understanding local meanings ascribed within such a reframing, which is not always dominated by similar concerns about benefits or interests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Furthermore, they help us to understand how and why TasP can be explained differently in specific country contexts. Indeed, how systems, institutions and structures deal with the reframing of meanings and associations traditionally ascribed to HIV treatment that is increasingly seen as prevention is a key domain of enquiry for social sciences (Keogh & Dodds, 2015). In this regard, our findings illustrate the importance of understanding local meanings ascribed within such a reframing, which is not always dominated by similar concerns about benefits or interests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As HIV prevention efforts are social interventions, consideration of the different meanings afforded to biomedical prevention efforts among high risk populations is significant. While some research identifies PrEP as disrupting and challenging traditional HIV prevention discourse (Keogh and Dodds , Spieldenner ), there is little research seeking to critically analyse the complexities of competing constructions of PrEP and PrEP users within gay and bisexual communities. By analysing the competing constructions of PrEP as well as the ways symbolic boundaries are drawn between PrEP users, this paper aims to make deeper meaning of how certain subcultural norms and values shape sexual health beliefs and practices within gay and bisexual communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is critical that researchers continue to be attuned to the way in which changes in the social and sexual world that gay men inhabit, including the increasing focus on pharmaceutical HIV prevention technologies, shift understandings of risk and responsibility, and imbue HIV testing with new meanings [ 7 ]. As Keogh and Dodds’ [ 7 ] note, as individuals and communities engage with ‘new’ HIV prevention technologies, those involved in health promotion and intervention design must continue to engage with earlier research that focused on issues around morality, responsibility and rights, with a view to ensuring that ongoing prevention efforts are equitable and do not increase health inequalities among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%