2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4653-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of HIV testing practices among young gay and bisexual men living in Scotland: a qualitative study

Abstract: BackgroundIncreasing overall rates, and frequency, of HIV testing in populations at risk is a key public health objective and a critical dimension of HIV prevention efforts. In the UK, men who have sex with men (MSM) remain one of the communities most at risk of HIV and, within this, young gay men are a key risk group. Understanding HIV testing practices is important in the development of interventions to promote testing among young gay and bisexual men.MethodsQualitative interviews were conducted with thirty … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they stress that many pathways of social support have not yet been explored in HIV intervention studies. Other studies also suggest social support is important for HIV testing and that low levels of social support may serve as a barrier to testing among numerous populations of men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United Kingdom and United States [18,19]. Social support also has been found to be an important factor in disclosing one’s status to others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they stress that many pathways of social support have not yet been explored in HIV intervention studies. Other studies also suggest social support is important for HIV testing and that low levels of social support may serve as a barrier to testing among numerous populations of men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United Kingdom and United States [18,19]. Social support also has been found to be an important factor in disclosing one’s status to others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are presented at two different times: the first is a demonstration of the general characteristics of the 48 selected studies and the second is the compilation of the most relevant and recurring themes of the analyzed production. Of the 48 selected studies for this synthesis, 24 (50%) were conducted in North America (mainly the United States) , eight (16.7%) in Thematic synthesis HIV prevention qualitative studies in men who have sex with men (MSM) Europe [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] , five (10.4%) in Africa [52][53][54][55][56] , four (8.3%) in Oceania [57][58][59][60] , four (8.3%) in South and Central America [61][62][63][64] and three (6.2%) in Asia [65][66][67] (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 48 studies previously mentioned, 38 dealt exclusively with the population of MSM without HIV, and of these, eight studies included ethnic markers 25,29,33,38,40,42,43,52 and three of them included generational markers 26,45,48 . Four other studies included populations of MSM and HIV-positive people within the dynamics of serodiscordant relationships.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several typologies relating to HIV testing behaviors have been proposed in the extant literature. Boydell, Buston, and McDaid (2017) propose three patterns of HIV testing among young gay and bisexual men in Scotland, including habitual testers who test as a personal or community responsibility, reactive testers who test in response to exposure to sexual risk or to new relationships, and ad hoc testers who are motivated to test but experience barriers or disruptions to regular testing schedules. Similarly, Hussen and colleagues (2013) propose a typology of four testing patterns among Black men who have sex with men (MSM) in southeastern United States, namely, maintenance testers who test regularly as a responsibility to self, risk-based testers who test as a result of sexual behavior or new relationships, convenience testers who test as and when opportunities arise, and test avoiders who test irregularly or do not follow up on results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%