Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-015-0122-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmaceutical care of adolescents with diabetes mellitus type 1: the DIADEMA study, a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: This study suggests that multidisciplinary PhC may add value in the management of T1DM in adolescents with inadequate glycemic control. However, the optimal methods on how to achieve sustained, long-term improvements in this challenging population require further study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14][15][16][17] The remaining 11 studies that had A1C values as a primary outcome were selected to be appropriate for the meta-analysis. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Further Analysis Procedure…”
Section: Systematic Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17] The remaining 11 studies that had A1C values as a primary outcome were selected to be appropriate for the meta-analysis. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Further Analysis Procedure…”
Section: Systematic Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study the mean HbA1c level significantly decreased (0.83%) after six months in the intervention group compared with an increase of 0.43% in the control group (p ≤ 0.001) [29]. The DIabetes in ADolescence Engagement and Monitoring by pharmacists (DIADEMA) study, conducted simultaneously in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Germany, also lead to similar conclusions -the improvement in HbA1c levels was significantly greater in the intervention group vs. the control group at six months (change from baseline -0.54 vs. +0.32%, p = 0.0075) [30]. The extraordinary usefulness of pharmaceutical care in the geriatric population diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and hypertension was shown in the study performed by Brazilian Neto et al [31], where the length of follow-up was 36-months.…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Care Of Cardiology Patientsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…With this empow-erment patients achieved better glycemic control mea-sured by lower HbA1c-values (1). Better glycemic control can minimise the risk of short-and long-term diabetes related complications such as retinopathy or blindness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%