Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Among patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation, prasugrel did not significantly reduce the frequency of the primary end point, as compared with clopidogrel, and similar risks of bleeding were observed. (Funded by Eli Lilly and Daiichi Sankyo; TRILOGY ACS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699998.).

Abstract-Optimal angiogenic and lymphangiogenic gene therapy requires knowledge of the best growth factors for each purpose. We studied the therapeutic potential of human vascular

AimsCardiopoietic cells, produced through cardiogenic conditioning of patients’ mesenchymal stem cells, have shown preliminary efficacy. The Congestive Heart Failure Cardiopoietic Regenerative Therapy (CHART-1) trial aimed to validate cardiopoiesis-based biotherapy in a larger heart failure cohort.Methods and resultsThis multinational, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study was conducted in 39 hospitals. Patients with symptomatic ischaemic heart failure on guideline-directed therapy (n = 484) were screened; n = 348 underwent bone marrow harvest and mesenchymal stem cell expansion. Those achieving > 24 million mesenchymal stem cells (n = 315) were randomized to cardiopoietic cells delivered endomyocardially with a retention-enhanced catheter (n = 157) or sham procedure (n = 158). Procedures were performed as randomized in 271 patients (n = 120 cardiopoietic cells, n = 151 sham). The primary efficacy endpoint was a Finkelstein–Schoenfeld hierarchical composite (all-cause mortality, worsening heart failure, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score, 6-min walk distance, left ventricular end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction) at 39 weeks. The primary outcome was neutral (Mann–Whitney estimator 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–0.61 [value > 0.5 favours cell treatment], P = 0.27). Exploratory analyses suggested a benefit of cell treatment on the primary composite in patients with baseline left ventricular end-diastolic volume 200–370 mL (60% of patients) (Mann–Whitney estimator 0.61, 95% CI 0.52–0.70, P = 0.015). No difference was observed in serious adverse events. One (0.9%) cardiopoietic cell patient and 9 (5.4%) sham patients experienced aborted or sudden cardiac death.ConclusionThe primary endpoint was neutral, with safety demonstrated across the cohort. Further evaluation of cardiopoietic cell therapy in patients with elevated end-diastolic volume is warranted.

Background— It is unclear what is the most efficient vector and growth factor for induction of therapeutic vascular growth in the heart. Furthermore, the histological nature of angiogenesis and potential side effects caused by different vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) in myocardium have not been documented. Methods and Results— Adenoviruses (Ad) at 2 doses (2×10 11 and 2×10 12 viral particles) or naked plasmids (1 mg) encoding Lac Z control, VEGF-A 165 , or the mature, soluble form of VEGF-D (VEGF-D ΔNΔC ) were injected intramyocardially with the NOGA catheter system into domestic pigs. AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC gene transfer (GT) induced a dose-dependent myocardial protein production, as measured by ELISA, resulting in an efficient angiogenic effect 6 days after the injections. Also, AdVEGF-A 165 produced high gene transfer efficacy, as demonstrated with immunohistochemistry, leading to prominent angiogenesis effects. Despite the catheter-mediated approach, angiogenesis induced by both AdVEGFs was transmural, with maximal effects in the epicardium. Histologically, strongly enlarged α-smooth muscle actin–positive microvessels involving abundant cell proliferation were found in the transduced regions, whereas microvessel density did not change. Myocardial contrast echocardiography and microspheres showed marked increases in perfusion in the transduced areas. VEGF-D ΔNΔC but not matrix-bound VEGF-A 165 was detected in plasma after adenoviral GT. A modified Miles assay demonstrated myocardial edema resulting in pericardial effusion with the higher AdVEGF doses. All effects returned to baseline by 3 weeks. Naked plasmid–mediated GT did not induce detectable protein production or vascular effects. Conclusions— Like AdVEGF-A 165 , AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC GT using the NOGA system produces efficient transmural angiogenesis and increases myocardial perfusion. AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC could be useful for the induction of therapeutic vascular growth in the heart.

Previous studies have shown that fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-1, FGF-2, and FGF-5 induce therapeutic angiogenesis. Here, we investigated the potential of FGF-4 for therapeutic neovascularization in comparison to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), using adenoviral gene transfer in a novel rabbit hind limb ischemia model, with ischemia restricted to the calf. Magnetic resonance imaging and a modified Miles assay showed that both AdFGF-4 and AdVEGF given intramuscularly (i.m.) resulted in increases in vascular permeability and edema in transduced muscles 6 days after the gene transfer. In contrast, recombinant FGF-4 protein injected in the rabbit skin did not induce acute vascular permeability. Injections (i.m.) of AdFGF-4 and AdVEGF, but not intra-arterially administered AdVEGF, increased collateral growth, popliteal blood flow, and muscle perfusion compared with controls. The angiogenesis response consisted mainly of the enlargement of pre-existing vessels rather than an increase in capillary density. Adenoviral FGF-4 overexpression up-regulated endogenous VEGF, which may explain many of the effects thought to be specific for VEGF such as the increase in vascular permeability. This study demonstrates for the first time that FGF-4 induces vascular permeability, therapeutic angiogenesis, and arteriogenesis comparable to that of VEGF and could be useful for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease.

No abstract

Recent discovery of new members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family has generated much interest as to which members may be best suited for therapeutic angiogenesis in various tissues. In this study we evaluated angiogenic responses of the different members of the VEGF family in vivo using adenoviral gene transfer. Adenoviruses (1 x 10(9) plaque-forming units [pfu]) encoding for VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-C(deltaNdeltaC) and VEGF-D(deltaNdeltaC) (deltaNdeltaC are proteolytically cleaved forms) were transferred locally to the periadventitial space of the rabbit carotid arteries using a collar technique that allows efficient local transfection of the periadventitial tissue. Expression of the transfected VEGFs was confirmed by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Seven days after the gene transfer maximum neovessel formation was observed in VEGF-A-, VEGF-D-, and VEGF-D(deltaNdeltaC)-transfected arteries. VEGF-C(deltaNdeltaC) also showed angiogenic activity whereas VEGF-B was not effective in inducing angiogenesis. Pericytes were detected around the neovessels, which also frequently showed the presence of intraluminal erythrocytes. Infiltration of inflammatory cells in response to VEGF-D and VEGF-D(deltaNdeltaC) was less prominent than that caused by other VEGFs. In line with the absence of lymphatics in the normal carotid arteries no significant evidence of lymphatic vessel formation was seen in response to any of the studied VEGFs in the periadventitial space. The results help to define possibilities for local angiogenic therapy around blood vessels and support the concept that angiogenic effects may be tissue-specific and depend both on the growth factor ligands and the target tissues. It is concluded that VEGF-A, VEGF-D, and VEGF-D(deltaNdeltaC) are the best candidates for therapeutic angiogenesis when delivered around large arteries.