2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phalloplasty in biological men with penile insufficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of methods, both RFFF and ALTF result in good erogenous sensation. The main drawback lies in the urinary complications, particularly strictures and fistulae, that often necessitate a second corrective surgery [ 31 ]. Therefore, ensuring the patient is fully informed of the potential complications and, should one arise, high likelihood of an additional surgery is of utmost importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regardless of methods, both RFFF and ALTF result in good erogenous sensation. The main drawback lies in the urinary complications, particularly strictures and fistulae, that often necessitate a second corrective surgery [ 31 ]. Therefore, ensuring the patient is fully informed of the potential complications and, should one arise, high likelihood of an additional surgery is of utmost importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used donor sites are the forearm and anterolateral thigh [ 26 ]. As we will discuss, the RFFF is the gold standard, and is the most commonly performed type [ 31 ]. RFFF achieves high patient satisfaction with cosmetic appearance and phallic urination [ 26 ].…”
Section: Phalloplastymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first series was reported in the early 1970s, and in the following decades, advances in penile reconstruction surgery have been described [40]. The harvesting of a fasciocutaneous neophallus on a free flap on the radial artery or anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) has been reported with satisfactory outcomes, and more recently, the osteocutaneous fibula flap, the free scapular flap, the suprapubic abdominal wall flap, and the vertical rectus abdominis flap have been proposed as surgical options for the treatment of micropenis [41,42]. The radial forearm free flap is the gold standard site to penile reconstruction surgery, mostly applied in female to male transsexualism, which consists in a microsurgical dissection of a radial forearm flap, possibly the nondominant arm should be chosen for flap harvest, and construction of a tube-within-a-tube phallus while the flap is still pedicled to the forearm [41,43,44] (Fig.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%