2019
DOI: 10.6027/tn2019-515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PFASs in the Nordic environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 36 In a Nordic screening study, PFPrA could be detected in two locations at similar concentrations. 37 However, PFPrA could not be detected in Lake Vättern (<0.2 ng/L) in surface water from 2017, suggesting a buildup in concentration due to the annual input from atmospheric sources. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies reporting concentrations of TFMS in surface water in lakes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“… 36 In a Nordic screening study, PFPrA could be detected in two locations at similar concentrations. 37 However, PFPrA could not be detected in Lake Vättern (<0.2 ng/L) in surface water from 2017, suggesting a buildup in concentration due to the annual input from atmospheric sources. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies reporting concentrations of TFMS in surface water in lakes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry; LC-MS/MS) and then converted to fluorine-equivalent concentrations. EOF mass balance studies have been carried out on a wide range of matrices, including water, 5,6 sediment, 7 sludge, 8 biological samples, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and consumer products, [16][17][18] all of which report a large proportion of samples containing unidentified EOF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFASs lacking standards which contribute to the EOF. Another option is to extract the samples without using ISs, split the final extract and analyze this in both target and total fluorine analysis, adding IS to the fraction for targeted analysis only 45. Although this approach leads to inaccuracies in the targeted data (since these data would be uncorrected for procedural losses), an additional extraction for targeted analysis with ISs could be included, assuming sufficient sample…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%