1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-4937(98)00026-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petrologic and geochemical links between the post-collisional Proterozoic Harney Peak leucogranite, South Dakota, USA, and its source rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) can suggest that plagioclase, biotite, garnet, and alkali feldspar fractionated during crystal fractionation or represent residual phases. Using major element least-square modeling (e.g., Chayes 1968;Bryan et al 1969;Albarède and Provost 1977;Nabelek and Bartlett 1998;Ortega Cuesta 1998;Villaseca et al 1999) and the mineralogical composition of the residue as inferred from the geochemistry, different combinations of protoliths and residuum were modeled. The composition of the residual minerals was constrained using migmatitic pelites and orthogneisses of the Tormes Dome (Gil Ibarguchi and Martinez 1982;Escuder Viruete 1999;Escuder Viruete et al 2000), experimental work involving augen gneisses (Holtz and Johannes 1991;Castro et al 2000), and metapelites/metagreywackes (Vielzeuf and Holloway 1988;Le Breton and Thompson 1988;Patiño Douce et al 1993;Patiño Douce and Beard 1996;Montel and Vielzeuf 1997;Patiño Douce and Harris 1998;Pickering and Johnston 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7) can suggest that plagioclase, biotite, garnet, and alkali feldspar fractionated during crystal fractionation or represent residual phases. Using major element least-square modeling (e.g., Chayes 1968;Bryan et al 1969;Albarède and Provost 1977;Nabelek and Bartlett 1998;Ortega Cuesta 1998;Villaseca et al 1999) and the mineralogical composition of the residue as inferred from the geochemistry, different combinations of protoliths and residuum were modeled. The composition of the residual minerals was constrained using migmatitic pelites and orthogneisses of the Tormes Dome (Gil Ibarguchi and Martinez 1982;Escuder Viruete 1999;Escuder Viruete et al 2000), experimental work involving augen gneisses (Holtz and Johannes 1991;Castro et al 2000), and metapelites/metagreywackes (Vielzeuf and Holloway 1988;Le Breton and Thompson 1988;Patiño Douce et al 1993;Patiño Douce and Beard 1996;Montel and Vielzeuf 1997;Patiño Douce and Harris 1998;Pickering and Johnston 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the calculated melt fractions obtained in mass-balance modeling represent maximum values as they are not controlled by the contribution of water in consumed mica. Furthermore, metastable muscovite in experiments may lower the proportion of melt (Patiño Douce and Harris 1998;Nabelek and Bartlett 1998).…”
Section: Partial Melting and Crystal Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2]). There is general agreement that highly differentiated leucogranitic magmas (leucogranites) could be mostly related to anatectic products of metapelitic crustal sources [3][4][5] although the heat sources for their production have remained controversial [6]. Associated intermediate to basic plutonic rocks are typically lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-ion lithophile elements such as Rb, Sr, Ba and Cs and their ratios, as well as the REE, are commonly used as monitors of magmatic differentiation (e.g., Halliday et al, 1991;Morteani et al, 1995;Icenhower and London, 1996;Nabelek and Bartlett, 1998;Nabelek, 1999;Jung et al, 2000;Dahlquist et al, 2007). Therefore, we have applied a fractional crystallization model to investigate the behavior of Rb, Sr, Ba and also the REE during this process in the Huaco granite pluton.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%