The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1177/0144598718806449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Petrography and facies distribution of Middle Ordovician Ma 51 + 2 tight dolomite reservoirs in the Ordos Basin, Central China

Abstract: The Middle Ordovician Majiagou Formation in the eastern Ordos Basin, central China, is an important area in the exploration for tight carbonate gas, especially within weathering crust layers in the first and second submembers of the fifth member of the formation (herein referred to as Ma 5 1 þ 2). However, karstification prevents a clear understanding of the petrological characteristics and facies distribution of these layers, which hinders exploration. Based on cores, thin sections, and cathodoluminescence an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have highlighted the formation of moldic pores by selective fabric dissolution resulting from syngenetic karst during the deposition of Ma 5 1+2 and argued that this process was the key to reservoir formation in karstic materials . However, there was no significant regional difference across the study area in terms of karstification during the deposition of Ma 5 1+2 . Alternatively, the regional differences in reservoir capacity could be explained by variation in Caledonian karstification, which was controlled largely by karst paleogeomorphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Previous studies have highlighted the formation of moldic pores by selective fabric dissolution resulting from syngenetic karst during the deposition of Ma 5 1+2 and argued that this process was the key to reservoir formation in karstic materials . However, there was no significant regional difference across the study area in terms of karstification during the deposition of Ma 5 1+2 . Alternatively, the regional differences in reservoir capacity could be explained by variation in Caledonian karstification, which was controlled largely by karst paleogeomorphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…C and O isotopes showed variations in different lithologic samples (Table 3). Except for one sample (N3-11, −5.2‰), the δ 13 C contents of the matrix were concentrated in -2.8‰~+0.2‰, with an average of -1.0‰; and the δ 18 O contents were −9.8‰~−5.2‰, with an average of −7.1‰ (the δ 18 O content of N3-11 was −8.3‰). The δ 13 C and δ 18 O contents of…”
Section: Isotopic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Four representative thin sections were selected for in situ major, trace, and rare earth element analysis. Powdered samples were selected for geochemical analyses (e.g., δ 13 C, δ 18 O, and 87 Sr/ 86 Sr), using a micro-mill with a drilling bit diameter of 0.25 mm. To distinguish between matrix and cement, a total of 20 samples were collected for C and O isotope analysis, and 16 samples were collected for Sr isotope analysis.…”
Section: Samples Selectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the Middle Ordovician, the study area was a restricted-evaporatic carbonate platform, in which the circulation of seawater was greatly restricted (Chen et al 2018;Liu et al 2019). In such a geographic setting, a warm, semiarid to arid climate could have enhanced evaporation and resulted in elevated salinity of the seawater.…”
Section: Dolomitization History and Dolomites Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%