Abstract:The Middle Ordovician Majiagou Formation in the eastern Ordos Basin, central China, is an important area in the exploration for tight carbonate gas, especially within weathering crust layers in the first and second submembers of the fifth member of the formation (herein referred to as Ma 5 1 þ 2). However, karstification prevents a clear understanding of the petrological characteristics and facies distribution of these layers, which hinders exploration. Based on cores, thin sections, and cathodoluminescence an… Show more
“…Previous studies have highlighted the formation of moldic pores by selective fabric dissolution resulting from syngenetic karst during the deposition of Ma 5 1+2 and argued that this process was the key to reservoir formation in karstic materials . However, there was no significant regional difference across the study area in terms of karstification during the deposition of Ma 5 1+2 . Alternatively, the regional differences in reservoir capacity could be explained by variation in Caledonian karstification, which was controlled largely by karst paleogeomorphology.…”
Karstification in carbonate successions has an important influence on hydrocarbon accumulation. Taking the Ordos Basin, currently the largest petroliferous basin in China, as an example, this study examines the large‐scale, long‐term (~120 Myr) paleokarst at the top of the Ordovician. The objectives of the study are to characterize the karst paleogeomorphology of this area, to explain the inconsistency between existing understandings of karst paleogeomorphology and exploration in the eastern Ordos Basin, and to reveal the control of paleokarst on natural gas accumulation and its paleogeographic significance. A total of 860 exploration wells were used for detailed stratigraphic correlation and analysis, along with core observations, well‐logging analyses, physical property characterization, and isotope analyses. Results of residual thickness and moldic thickness reconstruction reveal variation in karst paleogeomorphology between north and south in the eastern Ordos Basin, differing from the traditionally recognized E‐W variation. Two geomorphic units are classified as follows: the karst highland and the karst slope from north to south, with the karst slope being subdivided into northern and southern slope areas. The karst highland area has negligible reservoir capacity and hydrocarbon accumulation owing to the enhanced denudation that occurred there. In contrast, the northern karst slope shows favorable reservoir properties and has abundant gas wells according to well‐logging interpretations, whereas the southern karst slope is of poor reservoir quality and hosts mainly water wells. Differences in dissolution‐filling effects controlled by the surface paleodrainage system are suggested to be the main contributor to differential reservoir space preservation, which, together with the variable width and depth of source rocks in the grooves (thereby variably exposing source rock), further promoted differential gas accumulation. The Ordos Basin and its periphery in the southwestern North China Craton (NCC) show inheritance of sedimentary‐tectonic patterns from the Middle Ordovician to the Late Carboniferous. These results should provide a reference for hydrocarbon exploration in the Ordovician of other basins in the NCC in which karst occurs and karst basins worldwide, and deepens understanding of the paleogeographic framework in the context of regional uplift of the North China Platform.
“…Previous studies have highlighted the formation of moldic pores by selective fabric dissolution resulting from syngenetic karst during the deposition of Ma 5 1+2 and argued that this process was the key to reservoir formation in karstic materials . However, there was no significant regional difference across the study area in terms of karstification during the deposition of Ma 5 1+2 . Alternatively, the regional differences in reservoir capacity could be explained by variation in Caledonian karstification, which was controlled largely by karst paleogeomorphology.…”
Karstification in carbonate successions has an important influence on hydrocarbon accumulation. Taking the Ordos Basin, currently the largest petroliferous basin in China, as an example, this study examines the large‐scale, long‐term (~120 Myr) paleokarst at the top of the Ordovician. The objectives of the study are to characterize the karst paleogeomorphology of this area, to explain the inconsistency between existing understandings of karst paleogeomorphology and exploration in the eastern Ordos Basin, and to reveal the control of paleokarst on natural gas accumulation and its paleogeographic significance. A total of 860 exploration wells were used for detailed stratigraphic correlation and analysis, along with core observations, well‐logging analyses, physical property characterization, and isotope analyses. Results of residual thickness and moldic thickness reconstruction reveal variation in karst paleogeomorphology between north and south in the eastern Ordos Basin, differing from the traditionally recognized E‐W variation. Two geomorphic units are classified as follows: the karst highland and the karst slope from north to south, with the karst slope being subdivided into northern and southern slope areas. The karst highland area has negligible reservoir capacity and hydrocarbon accumulation owing to the enhanced denudation that occurred there. In contrast, the northern karst slope shows favorable reservoir properties and has abundant gas wells according to well‐logging interpretations, whereas the southern karst slope is of poor reservoir quality and hosts mainly water wells. Differences in dissolution‐filling effects controlled by the surface paleodrainage system are suggested to be the main contributor to differential reservoir space preservation, which, together with the variable width and depth of source rocks in the grooves (thereby variably exposing source rock), further promoted differential gas accumulation. The Ordos Basin and its periphery in the southwestern North China Craton (NCC) show inheritance of sedimentary‐tectonic patterns from the Middle Ordovician to the Late Carboniferous. These results should provide a reference for hydrocarbon exploration in the Ordovician of other basins in the NCC in which karst occurs and karst basins worldwide, and deepens understanding of the paleogeographic framework in the context of regional uplift of the North China Platform.
“…C and O isotopes showed variations in different lithologic samples (Table 3). Except for one sample (N3-11, −5.2‰), the δ 13 C contents of the matrix were concentrated in -2.8‰~+0.2‰, with an average of -1.0‰; and the δ 18 O contents were −9.8‰~−5.2‰, with an average of −7.1‰ (the δ 18 O content of N3-11 was −8.3‰). The δ 13 C and δ 18 O contents of…”
Section: Isotopic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Four representative thin sections were selected for in situ major, trace, and rare earth element analysis. Powdered samples were selected for geochemical analyses (e.g., δ 13 C, δ 18 O, and 87 Sr/ 86 Sr), using a micro-mill with a drilling bit diameter of 0.25 mm. To distinguish between matrix and cement, a total of 20 samples were collected for C and O isotope analysis, and 16 samples were collected for Sr isotope analysis.…”
Section: Samples Selectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…carbonate reservoirs have their own unique attributes, because they are composed of evaporites and carbonate rock assemblages under the influence of paleogeographical location and paleoclimate [15]. There are large-scale micrite dolomite reservoirs containing irregular-circular gypsum mold pores that are rarely found elsewhere [16][17][18]; these gypsum mold pores are filled with calcite cement or residual gypsum minerals [19][20][21]. These coarse-grained secondary calcites originated from meteoric freshwater during epigenetic diagenesis [13,22].…”
Karst reservoirs have always been a key field of oil and gas exploration. However, quantifying the process of meteoric transformation remains a persistent challenge that limits the accuracy of reservoir quality prediction. To explore the controlling factors of meteoric cementation on karst reservoirs, the Majiagou Formation of the Ordos Basin in China was selected as an example. The petrology; carbon, oxygen, and strontium isotopes; and in situ major, trace, and rare earth elements were used, types and origins of calcite cements were analyzed in detail. The results revealed five types of calcite cements (Cal-1~Cal-5), four types of cathodoluminescence (CL) intensities (dull, dull red, deep red, and bright red luminescence), and six types of rare earth element patterns (Pattern-1~Pattern-6). These five types of calcite cements developed in three periods. Cal-1 (transition CL) and Cal-2 (dull CL) were precipitated during the Early Pennsylvanian period, the meteoric freshwater was clean; Cal-3 (transition CL) and Cal-4 (bright red CL) were precipitated at the end of the Late Carboniferous period, the fluids had strong dissolution ability and were polluted by terrigenous debris; Cal-5 (transition CL) was deposited during the burial period, the fluid was pure pore water or groundwater. The control of the cement on the reservoir during the burial period was much weaker than that of meteoric cements. Therefore, explorations of karst reservoirs should be focused on weak cementation during the epigenetic period.
“…During the Middle Ordovician, the study area was a restricted-evaporatic carbonate platform, in which the circulation of seawater was greatly restricted (Chen et al 2018;Liu et al 2019). In such a geographic setting, a warm, semiarid to arid climate could have enhanced evaporation and resulted in elevated salinity of the seawater.…”
Section: Dolomitization History and Dolomites Evolutionmentioning
The Middle Ordovician subsalt Majiagou Formation in the Ordos Basin comprises pervasively dolomitized shallow marine limestone and is a major reservoir rich in natural gas resources. Four types of dolomite matrix and cement were identified based on petrographic textures: (very) finely crystalline, non-planar to planar-s matrix dolomite (Md1); finely to medium crystalline, planar-s to planar-e matrix dolomite (Md2); microbialites comprising dolomite microcrystals (Md3); and finely to coarsely crystalline dolomite cement (Cd). The Md1 and Md2 dolomites were controlled by alternating lagoon-shoal facies and have δ13C values (− 1.89 to + 1.45‰ VPDB for Md1, − 1.35 to + 0.42‰ VPDB for Md2) that fall within or are slightly higher than the coeval seawater, suggesting the dolomitizing fluid of evaporated seawater. Md2 dolomite was then subjected to penecontemporaneous karstification by meteoric water and burial recrystallization by sealed brines during diagenesis, as indicated by its relatively lower δ18O values (− 8.89 to − 5.73‰ VPDB) and higher 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.708920–0.710199). Md3 dolomite comprises thrombolite and stromatolite and is interpreted to form by a combination of initial microbial mediation and later replacive dolomitization related to evaporated seawater. Cd dolomite was associated with early-formed karst system in the Md2 host dolomite. The lowest δ18O values (− 11.78 to − 10.18‰ VPDB) and 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.708688–0.708725) and fluid inclusion data (Th: 123–175 °C) indicate involvement of hydrothermal fluid from which the Cd dolomite precipitated during deep burial. These results reveal the multi-stage dolomitization history of the Majiagou Formation and provide new constraints on fluid origins and dolomites evolution during deep burial in old superimposed basins, such as the Ordos Basin and elsewhere.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.