Petrogenetic evolution of Lichi volcanics from Arunachal Himalaya, Northeast India: Insights from geochemical modelling

Abstract

The Lichi volcanic rocks crop out along the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) of the Arunachal Himalaya, northeast India are comprised primarily of sub‐alkaline basalt (SiO2 ranges from 48.66 to 50.62 wt%), with minor trachy‐andesite (SiO2 ranges from 57% to 61.42 wt%). The distribution of incompatible trace elements, low concentrations of large‐ion lithophile elements, and REE behaviour suggests an enriched nature of the studied rocks and limited influence of the crustal contamination during their evolution. Linear distribution trends of major oxide, consistent patterns of trace elements, and REEs on primitive mantle‐ and chondrite‐normalized diagrams suggest the cogenetic nature of mafic basaltic rocks and intermediate trachy‐andesite. The variation in Ti/Y (256.00–469.95) and Zr/Y (7.65–36.96) ratios indicates that garnet was present in the source. The well‐defined geochemical trends on variation diagram and the sub‐parallel trends on the chondrite‐normalized REE patterns suggest that fractional crystallization processes have played a major role in the evolution of parental magma. Petrogenetic modelling implies that the sub‐alkaline basalts and intermediate rocks were derived from low‐degree partial melting (1%–5%) of a garnet bearing peridotite source. The melt further evolved by fractional crystallization. We conclude that the geochemical attributes of the Lichi volcanics of the Arunachal Himalaya imply their emplacement in a continental extensional regime and possibly resulted from the Cretaceous Kerguelen plume activities.

Introduction, Part 2—Geodynamic evolution of Eastern Himalaya and Indo‐Myanmar orogenic belts: Advances through interdisciplinary studies

“…Petrological characteristics of Lichi volcanics exposed in the Kimin–Yazali road section of the Papumpare district, Arunachal Himalaya were discussed to constrain the petrogenetic evolution and tectonic significance ( Sharma et al, 2022). Petrogenetic modelling implies that the sub‐alkaline basalts and intermediate rocks of the study area were derived from low‐degree partial melting (1%–5%) of a garnet‐bearing peridotite source.…”

“…Geological map of Eastern Himalaya, Indo‐Myanmar orogenic belt, northern, Central Myanmar, and adjacent areas (modified after Mitchell et al, 2007; Searle et al, 2007; Y. R. Singh, Singh, Singh, et al, 2022). Locations of study area presented in the issue include 1/S2: Kundu and Hazarika (2022); 2/S2: Y. R. Singh, Singh, Singh, et al (2022); 3/S2: Rawat and Luirei (2022); 4/S2: Kayal et al (2022); 5/S2: Choudhury et al (2022); 6/S2: N. M. Sharma et al (2022); 7/S2: Goswami, Gogoi, et al (2022); 8/S2: Bikramaditya et al (2022); 9/S2: Goswami, Kalita, et al (2022); 10/S2: Joshi (2022); 11/S2: Jha and Sharma (2022); 12/S2: Shukla et al (2022); 13/S2: Khonglah et al (2022); 14/S2: Ali and Duarah (2022); 15/S2: Mohanty et al (2022); 16/S2: Chanu et al (2022); 17/S2: Majumdar, Gogoi, and Ghatak (2022); Majumdar, Gogoi, Ghatak, Saikia, et al (2022); 18/S2: Ding et al (2022); 19/S2: Ghose et al (2022); 20/S2: Hussain and Dey (2022); 21/S2: Ozukum et al (2022); 22/S2: Jamir et al (2022); 23/S2: Chaubey et al (2022); 24/S2: Bora, Borah, et al (2022); Bora, Mukherjee, et al (2022); 25/S2: Khuman and Ibotombi (2022); 26/S2: Y. R. Singh, Singh, Singh, et al (2022); 27/S2: Thokchom and Kshetrimayum (2021); 28/S2: Barman et al (2022); 29/S2: V. Sharma and Biswas (2022)…”