2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pervaporation dehydration of isopropanol using blend membranes of chitosan and hydroxypropyl cellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that there is a band at 2Â = 20 • for CMCNa, which is due to the semi-crystalline nature of CMCNa. This semi-crystalline nature of CMCNa is mainly ascribed to the intra-molecular and intermolecular hydrogen bond [33]. However, WXAD curves for four PECs all showed no obvious band at 2Â = 20 • .…”
Section: Pervaporationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It can be seen that there is a band at 2Â = 20 • for CMCNa, which is due to the semi-crystalline nature of CMCNa. This semi-crystalline nature of CMCNa is mainly ascribed to the intra-molecular and intermolecular hydrogen bond [33]. However, WXAD curves for four PECs all showed no obvious band at 2Â = 20 • .…”
Section: Pervaporationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is noticed that the membranes made of CS-HPC-40 [38], CS/PTFE [40], CS/GPTMS (CSHM-5) [42], CS/NaY zeolite (40 wt%) [45], CS/HMDACS [46], CS/TiO 2 (40 mass%) [47] and composite membrane of SA and CS [49] exhibited higher flux compared to CS-wrapped MWCNTs incorporated SA membrane, but their selectivity was significantly lower (1.4 to 14.2 times) compared to membrane reported here. On the other hand, membranes made of CS-HPC-20 [38], CS/PVA-20/40 crosslinked with UFS [44], SA/De of both (60/40) and (50/50) exhibited higher selectivity, but their flux values are 1.46 to 2.99 times lower than that of CSwrapped MWCNTs incorporated SA membrane. Under this situation, the magnitude of PSI is the criteria to decide the overall PV performance of the membranes.…”
Section: Comparison Of Pv Performance Of Polysaccharide-based Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, nano-MnO 2 were synthesized and nano-sized MnO 2 showed greater advantages and newer characteristics than regular-sized particles, which have biocompatibility, electrocatalytic property and good solubility and dispersibility in water with special physical and chemical properties [14]. CS was chosen as the material to form the membrane due to its excellent film-forming and adhesion abilities, nontoxicity and biocompatibility [15]. To our knowledge, the enzyme sensors using nano-MnO 2 have been described [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%