1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.1997.00069.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation of fluid reabsorption in the efferent ducts of the rat by testosterone propionate, 17β‐oestradiol 3‐benzoate, flutamide and tamoxifen

Abstract: The regulation by oestradiol and testosterone of fluid reabsorption in the efferent ducts of the rat was investigated by determining the effects of administering the hormones and their antagonists. Untreated rats were compared to animals treated for 7 days with testosterone propionate (1 mg d(-1)), oestradiol benzoate (400 microg d(-1)), flutamide (10 mg d(-1)) or tamoxifen (1 mg d(-1)). Two procedures were used to measure perturbation of transepithelial fluid fluxes in vivo. The first procedure used cannulati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason of this discrepancy is not clear, but it is reported that low-dose administration of some estrogenic compounds increases the epididymal weights slightly but not significantly (Boockfor and Blake 1997;Biegel et al 1998;de Jager et al 1999;Lee 1998). Hansen et al (1997) reported that androgens promoted, and estrogens inhibited, luminal fluid resorption by epithelial cells of the efferent ducts in adult hormone-treated rats. Another report shows that estrogens regulate the resorption of luminal fluid in the head of the epididymis (Hess et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason of this discrepancy is not clear, but it is reported that low-dose administration of some estrogenic compounds increases the epididymal weights slightly but not significantly (Boockfor and Blake 1997;Biegel et al 1998;de Jager et al 1999;Lee 1998). Hansen et al (1997) reported that androgens promoted, and estrogens inhibited, luminal fluid resorption by epithelial cells of the efferent ducts in adult hormone-treated rats. Another report shows that estrogens regulate the resorption of luminal fluid in the head of the epididymis (Hess et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high dosage of estradiol (400 mg) was used because this was found to be effective for inducing complete estrogenization in male rats without inducing significant regression of the efferent ductules (Hansen et al 1997, Tena-Sempere et al 2000. The dosage of 75 mg estradiol was equivalent to that shown to induce a response in reproductive organs, with minimal histological alterations .…”
Section: Hormone Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dosage of 75 mg estradiol was equivalent to that shown to induce a response in reproductive organs, with minimal histological alterations . The dose regimen of 1 mg testosterone was used to mimic physiological serum testosterone levels and that of 5 mg testosterone and DHT was based on previous studies showing that this concentration reproduces that which is normally found in the epididymis (Hansen et al 1997, Fan & Robaire 1998, Goyal et al 1998. DHT, the non-aromatizable metabolite of testosterone, was used to get around the problem of whether the potential effects of testosterone were direct or were dependent upon aromatization to estrogen or 5a-reduction to DHT.…”
Section: Hormone Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study confirms that IgG enters the rete testis [9,10], and shows that most is reabsorbed mainly by the ductuli efferentes, although some is concentrated in the lumen as a consequence of fluid reabsorption by the ducts. The effect of administering estradiol on the concentration of specific IgG in the extratesticular ducts was examined, because the treatment is known to perturb fluid reabsorption in the ductuli efferentes [21][22][23] and so may affect the concentration of IgG in the duct system. Importantly, this work showed that the ductus epididymidis must recognize and compensate for a reduced function of the ductuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%