Luminal fluids were collected in vivo by micropuncture and cannulation from the rete testis, efferent ducts and ductus epididymidis of the rat to determine the composition of efferent duct fluids and the rates of reabsorption of water and solutes by the efferent ducts. The concentration of spermatozoa increased by a factor of about 25 from 2.42 x 10(4) microliters-1 in the fluid from the rete testis to 6.00 x 10(5) microliters-1 in fluid at the end of the efferent ducts, indicating that 96.2% of the fluid leaving the testis is reabsorbed from the lumen of the efferent ducts. Most of this reabsorption (70.9% or 33.4 microliters h-1) occurs in the region between the rete testis and the middle of the coni vasculosi, with only 25.1% (11.8 microliters h-1) occurring between the coni and the beginning of the ductus epididymidis. However, reabsorption across the epithelium occurs at about the same rate in both regions, with the proximal region reabsorbing 17.2 microliters cm-2 h-1 (70.9% of fluid entering the region) and the distal region reabsorbing 12.2 microliters cm-2 h-1 (86.1% of fluid entering the region). Consequently, the fluid reabsorption rate for the whole efferent duct system (15.6 microliters cm-2 h-1) is similar to the values for individual regions. The principal solutes in luminal fluids from the efferent ducts are Na+ (137-144 mM) and Cl- (113-130 mM). The estimated sum contribution of Na+, Cl- and K+ to the osmotic pressure of luminal fluids was approximately 80% at each site sampled in the efferent ducts. The osmotic pressure of luminal fluid samples (301-307 mosmol kg-1) did not vary significantly along the ducts or differ significantly from that of blood plasma. The results demonstrate that there is a net reabsorption in the efferent ducts of nearly all the testicular output of water and inorganic electrolytes, and most of the protein, and that, in comparison, the ductus epididymidis is a negligible site of net fluid reabsorption. The results indicate that the ductus epididymidis, rather than the efferent ducts, is the site of accumulation of high concentrations of specific organic compounds like inositol. The efferent ducts are similar to the homologous proximal tubules of the metanephric kidney in that the luminal electrolyte composition (principal solutes Na+ and Cl-) and osmotic pressure remain relatively stable and that fluid reabsorption is close to isotonic and occurs at the same rate as the reabsorption of Na+.

No abstract

Amphibians and reptiles are experiencing serious declines, with the number of threatened species and extinctions growing rapidly as the modern biodiversity crisis unfolds. For amphibians, the panzootic of chytridiomycosis is a major driver. For reptiles, habitat loss and harvesting from the wild are key threats. Cryopreservation and other assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) could play a role in slowing the loss of amphibian and reptile biodiversity and managing threatened populations through genome storage and the production of live animals from stored material. These vertebrate classes are at different stages of development in cryopreservation and other ARTs, and each class faces different technical challenges arising from the separate evolutionary end-points of their reproductive biology. For amphibians, the generation of live offspring from cryopreserved spermatozoa has been achieved, but the cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos remains elusive. With reptiles, spermatozoa have been cryopreserved in a few species, but no offspring from cryopreserved spermatozoa have been reported, and the generation of live young from AI has only occurred in a small number of species. Cryopreservation and ARTs are more developed and advanced for amphibians than reptiles. Future work on both groups needs to concentrate on achieving proof of concept examples that demonstrate the use of genome storage and ARTs in successfully recovering threatened species to increase awareness and support for this approach to conservation.

Compassionate conservation focuses on 4 tenets: first, do no harm; individuals matter; inclusivity of individual animals; and peaceful coexistence between humans and animals. Recently, compassionate conservation has been promoted as an alternative to conventional conservation philosophy. We believe examples presented by compassionate conservationists are deliberately or arbitrarily chosen to focus on mammals; inherently not compassionate; and offer ineffective conservation solutions. Compassionate conservation arbitrarily focuses on charismatic species, notably large predators and megaherbivores. The philosophy is not compassionate when it leaves invasive predators in the environment to cause harm to vastly more individuals of native species or uses the fear of harm by apex predators to terrorize mesopredators. Hindering the control of exotic species (megafauna, predators) in situ will not improve the conservation condition of the majority of biodiversity. The positions taken by so‐called compassionate conservationists on particular species and on conservation actions could be extended to hinder other forms of conservation, including translocations, conservation fencing, and fertility control. Animal welfare is incredibly important to conservation, but ironically compassionate conservation does not offer the best welfare outcomes to animals and is often ineffective in achieving conservation goals. Consequently, compassionate conservation may threaten public and governmental support for conservation because of the limited understanding of conservation problems by the general public.

Each amphibian species is evolutionarily distinct, having developed highly specialized and diverse reproductive strategies in both terrestrial and aquatic environments. These unique reproductive patterns and mechanisms, key to species propagation, have only been explored in a limited number of laboratory models. Although the development of applied reproductive technologies for amphibians has proven useful for a few threatened species, the real benefit of this technology has been new insights into the reproductive adaptations, behavior, endocrinology, and physiological mechanisms that have evolved over millions of years. As the basic fundamental database on amphibian reproductive physiology has grown, so has the applied benefit for species conservation. In particular, technologies such as non-invasive fecal and urinary hormone assays, hormone treatments for induced breeding or gamete collection, in vitro fertilization, and the ability to establish genome resource banks have all played important roles in monitoring or managing small populations of captive species. Amphibians have the ability to produce a large excess of germplasm (up to 10,000 ovulated eggs in a single reproductive event) that if not collected and preserved, would represent a wasted valuable resource. We discuss the current state of knowledge in assisted reproductive technologies for amphibians and why their extinction crisis means these available tools can no longer be implemented as small-scale, last-ditch efforts. The reproductive technologies must be established early as a key component of large-scale species recovery.