2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perturbation mapping of water leak in buried water pipes via laboratory validation experiments with high-frequency ground penetrating radar (GPR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous lab experiment with an upward pre‐drilled hole for leakage detection showed also that the reduced velocity resulted from an upward spread of the seepage water (Lai et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous lab experiment with an upward pre‐drilled hole for leakage detection showed also that the reduced velocity resulted from an upward spread of the seepage water (Lai et al . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because electromagnetic waves attenuate more with increasing free‐water content, horizontal scans of GPR data have proven to be useful in locating leakages in water pipes in materials like sand and concrete (e.g., Lai et al . ; Lai et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below are two of the most prominent algorithms within this category. a) Ground penetrating radar: One promising sensor specific HIL-based method that has been proposed in the [15]. This method sends high frequency electro-magnetic pulses and receives back the reflected echo [15].…”
Section: ) Sensor-specificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, metal detectors [3,4] and ground penetrating radar (GPR) [5][6][7] have been the primary means of locating buried pipelines. However, plastic pipes have been increasingly used in recent decades because of their low cost and low failure rates [8], which makes metal detectors inapplicable in most scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%