Perspectives Toward Seeking Treatment Among Patients With Psoriasis: Protocol for a Twitter Content Analysis

Abstract

Background Psoriasis is an autoimmune disease estimated to affect more than 6 million adults in the United States. It poses a significant public health problem and contributes to rising health care costs, affecting people’s quality of life and ability to work. Previous research showed that nontreatment and undertreatment of patients with psoriasis remain a significant problem. Perspectives of patients toward seeking psoriasis treatment are understudied. Social media offers a new data source of user-generated content. Researchers suggested that the social network Twitter may serve as a rich avenue for exploring how patients communicate about their health issues. Objective The objective of this study is to conduct a content analysis of Twitter posts (in English) published by users in the United States between February 1, 2016, and October 31, 2018, to examine perspectives that potentially influence the treatment decision among patients with psoriasis. Methods User-generated Twitter posts that include keywords related to psoriasis will be analyzed using text classifiers to identify themes related to the research questions. We will use Symplur Signals, a health care social media analytics platform, to access the Twitter data. We will use descriptive statistics to analyze the data and identify the most prevalent topics in the Twitter content among people with psoriasis. Results This study is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science through a Clinical and Translational Science Award award. Study approval was obtained from the institutional review board at the University of Southern California. Data extraction and cleaning are complete. For the time period from February 1, 2016, to October 31, 2018, we obtained 95,040 Twitter posts containing terms related to “psoriasis” from users in the United States published in English. After removing duplicates, retweets, and non-English tweets, we found that 75.51% (52,301/69,264) of the psoriasis-related posts were sent by commercial or bot-like accounts, while 16,963 posts were noncommercial and will be included in the analysis to assess the patient perspective. Analysis was completed in Summer 2020. Conclusions This protocol paper provides a detailed description of a social media research project including the process of data extraction, cleaning, and analysis. It is our goal to contribute to the development of more transparent social media research efforts. Our findings will shed light on whether Twitter provides a promising data source for garnering patient perspective data about psoriasis treatment decisions. The data will also help to determine whether Twitter might serve as a potential outreach platform for raising awareness of psoriasis and treatment options among patients and implementing related health interventions. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/13731

Patient listening on social media for patient-focused drug development: a synthesis of considerations from patients, industry and regulators

“…Going beyond symptoms, SML has the potential to contribute to a more holistic perspective of the disease burden by helping to understand (i) the factors that reduce the quality of life of patients ( 22 , 54 ), (ii) the social context into which they are embedded, as well as (iii) their emotional trajectories ( 20 , 22 ). It can provide background to understand treatment seeking and treatment selection behavior and the main factors involved therein ( 38 , 55 , 56 ). SML allows researchers to track patient perspectives and health trends over time, offering crucial insights into the evolution of diseases and patient experiences ( 57 ) and allows to capture evolving insights and trends in real time.…”

“…Often, the data posted and available for public viewing is not allowed to be scraped in a SML project, resulting in selection bias and potentially skewing results. Most published studies are carried out with content that has been made public without any further protection on the Web [e.g., ( 20 , 60 , 63 )] and apply methods to anonymize patients by removing or pseudo-anonymizing user names [e.g., ( 20 , 22 , 55 , 60 , 63 )]. While some studies have obtained explicitly approval by an ethics committee ( 22 , 43 , 63 ), others have mentioned explicitly to be exempt of obtaining approval due to the fact that they used only data that has been explicitly and manifestly made public [see, e.g., ( 38 )].…”

Capturing Emerging Realities in Citizen Engagement in Science in Social Media: A Social Media Analytics Protocol for the Allinteract Study

“…These differences are mainly related to the social network chosen for the analysis, the procedure for the identification of keywords, the definition of the units of analysis or the process of data analysis. Recently, some authors have developed protocols for content analysis in a specific social network (Reuter & Lee, 2021; Stens et al, 2020). These protocols provide a step-by-step description of how to conduct content analysis in social media, which is the cornerstone of research replicability.…”

Psoriasis Treatment on Youtube: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Living with a chronic, quality-decreasing disease for these patients means constantly gathering information and searching for new treatments from digital platforms that are increasingly becoming a part of our lives. 1,4 In a recent study conducted in our country, it was seen that 80% of patients with psoriasis use social media to get information about their disease. 5 According to current data, YouTube, which is a popular social media area with more than 2.5 billion active users, is used by 72.3% of the people over the age of 18 in our country.…”