2016
DOI: 10.1080/10572252.2016.1150517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on Uncertainty for Technical Communication Scholars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uncertainty is relegated to the backstage practices in the scientific sphere, while conservation and policy work is based on what is known, which is presented to be enough to recognize that there is a problem in the case of the monarch that needs to be addressed and acted on (cf. Walker & Walsh, 2012;Walsh & Walker, 2016). When uncertainty becomes known, these unknowns will not substantially change the general understanding of the monarch butterfly, its migration, and the threats it is exposed to or what to do to preserve it.…”
Section: Constructing and Communicating Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Uncertainty is relegated to the backstage practices in the scientific sphere, while conservation and policy work is based on what is known, which is presented to be enough to recognize that there is a problem in the case of the monarch that needs to be addressed and acted on (cf. Walker & Walsh, 2012;Walsh & Walker, 2016). When uncertainty becomes known, these unknowns will not substantially change the general understanding of the monarch butterfly, its migration, and the threats it is exposed to or what to do to preserve it.…”
Section: Constructing and Communicating Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By taking into account and drawing on differences between science and the public, collective narratives are coproduced that tell the common story of how to understand an environmental problem (Jasanoff, 2005b;Wynne, 2005). Drawing on the social domains of both science and the public, this coproduction of knowledge incorporates differences such as knowledge forms, risk perception, and how knowledge and values are related (Fischer & Young, 2007;Lidskog, 2008;Walsh & Walker, 2016;Wynne, 2005). By studying this coproduction of knowledge, it becomes possible to elaborate on the understanding of (1) the construction of public knowledge, (2) how uncertainty and complexity are managed when knowledge production bridges boundaries between science and the public, and (3) how public knowledge, through collective narratives, is made policy relevant with regard to complex and uncertain issues, such as environmental problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without testing the effects of realistic visualizations, it is difficult to assess to what extent that these distortions alter perception of risk. While it is very likely that these misleading effects exist, it is unclear whether realistic visualizations are in practice necessarily more or less misleading than other forms of less dramatic representation (including written and verbal communication [65]). For instance, to the extent that less evocative representations are viewed as having a higher degree of authority [41], it is entirely possible that the crystalizing effects of those representations may have an equal or greater capacity to mislead [66].…”
Section: Obscuring Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maps and graphs are not immune from the problem of being decontextualized, misunderstood, and potentially misused [20,21]. Technical uncertainty is distinct from and transformed by personal and political uncertainty [65].…”
Section: Obscuring Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be sure, in order for a polysemous concept such as uncertainty to be effectively conveyed requires some productive constraints. Lynda Walsh and I have recently argued for an understanding of uncertainties based upon the "spheres of discourse" model where uncertainty arguments circulate, translate, and hybridize among technical, personal, and public spheres of argument (Goodnight, 1982(Goodnight, /2012Walsh and Walker, 2016). When applied to science communication, it is rhetorical practices that find and integrate uncertainties across technical, personal, and public spheres of discourse that can be most effective for climate risk communication.…”
Section: The Spheres Model Of Uncertainty In Climate Risk Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%