1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3344-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perspectives on Organizing Crime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first organizing crime scenario was documented in particular work settings, such as the maritime ports that Block studied (Block & Chambliss, 1981;Block, 1991). More recent illustrations include McIllwain's (2004) study of New York City's Chinatown at the turn of the twentieth century and two studies on human smuggling channels (Zhang & Chin, 2002;Kleemans & van de Bunt, 2003).…”
Section: The Criminal and Legitimate Enterprise Overlapmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first organizing crime scenario was documented in particular work settings, such as the maritime ports that Block studied (Block & Chambliss, 1981;Block, 1991). More recent illustrations include McIllwain's (2004) study of New York City's Chinatown at the turn of the twentieth century and two studies on human smuggling channels (Zhang & Chin, 2002;Kleemans & van de Bunt, 2003).…”
Section: The Criminal and Legitimate Enterprise Overlapmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The garbage crisis in Naples displays some traits that enable this analysis to be taken further, approaching definitions provided by Block (1991) and Chambliss (1978). The former suggests that the term "organised crime" should be abandoned altogether in favour of the term "illegal enterprise".…”
Section: From Landesco To Block and Chamblissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depicted as a self-perpetuating criminal conspiracy, organised crime is viewed through the notion of bureaucracy, whereby it is described as hierarchically structured, characterise by formal rules and consisting of individuals with specialised and segmented functions within the hierarchy (Cressey 1969). Critics of this characterisation regard as credulous a sociology focused on big conspiracies and reject the ideas that crime groups are run by centralised syndicates, 'commissions' or 'boards of directors' who have a feudal-like control over their members (Albini 1971;Block 1991;Calder 1992;Chambliss 1978;Smith 1991). Despite such criticism, the above institutional definition has been reiterated for decades, while other analyses have simultaneously focused on strictly quantitative aspects, namely the number of individuals involved in a criminal group (Johnson 1962;Ferracuti 1988); the larger scale of its illegal activity (Moore 1987); and on a temporal variable, that is on the time-span during which illegal activities are conducted (Ianni 1972).…”
Section: Families and Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%