Perspectives of Science and Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction of Asia

Abstract

Science and technology innovation has always been present in Asia, but its application in disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been differential. In Asia, globally significant hotspots of disasters and economic development have emerged in which the application of science and technology in DRR has become an essential requirement for informed decision making. Science has supported establishment and implementation of major international initiatives in DRR, including the Hyogo Framework for Action [2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013][2014][2015]. The more recent Sendai Framework for DRR 2015-2030 recognizes the importance of science and technology in all of its priority action areas, and subsequent global and regional forums and conferences have reconfirmed science and technology's importance. To perceive and monitor the progress of science and technology in DRR, a qualitative assessment of different countries is made using three major attributes: (1) science-based decision making; (2) investment in science and technology; and (3) the intensity of science's link to the public. This assessment exercise points out several strengths and weaknesses in science and technology application; the method can be employed to develop future multistakeholder and multidisciplinary science and technology plans at the country level. To implement regional and national activities, a set of 15 recommendations is put forward, which will strengthen the collective regional ''science voice'' in DRR.

Disaster-mitigating and general innovative responses to climate disasters: Evidence from modern and historical China

“…On the one hand, innovations equip people with useful tools to cope with climate hazards. Shaw et al [18] find that hazard reduction in Asia has benefitted from the invention of early warning systems which forecast climate disasters. Moreover, technical innovations in construction enhance the resilience of buildings and infrastructures to various climate disasters.…”

Thirty Years of Science, Technology, and Academia in Disaster Risk Reduction and Emerging Responsibilities

“…The regional STAGs have also been proactive in enhancing country-based policy advocacy in several cases. Asia's regional STAG was formed in 2015, immediately after Sendai, and is considered one of the leading STAGs, with a specific plan of actions (Shaw et al 2016). Every two years, the Asia regional STAG organizes the Asia Science and Technology Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction (ASTCDRR), which brings together diverse stakeholders including scientists, academia, governments, civil society, media, private sectors, and UN agencies.…”

“…Post-Sendai DevelopmentsAtisi-Selma et al (2016) andShaw et al (2016) described and analyzed the key achievements of the Hyogo Framework, and its evolution to the Sendai Framework of Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. The Sendai Framework (UN 2015) aligns with global frameworks like the Sustainable Development goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement, and thus the development and disaster nexus becomes crucial.…”

Textile Multiantenna Technology and Relaying Architectures for Emergency Networks

“…The achievable rates of the amplify-and-forward half-duplex MIMO-based two-hop single relay channel with G as in (4) and (5) can be written as in (6) [22,23].…”

“…Nevertheless, even within this broad approach there is in most of the cases a first need for human intervention for emergency reaction after the disaster and this is where first responders, public protection, and disaster relief personnel or emergency services appear. Specifically, Priority 4 "Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response and to Build Back Better in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction" [3] of the instruments that have always played and will play a very important role on disaster managing, preparedness and intervention [4][5][6].…”