2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized multi-period tour recommendations

Abstract: During a trip planning, tourists gather information from different sources, select and rank the places to visit according to their personal interests, and try to devise daily tours among them. This paper addresses the complex selection and touring problem and proposes a "filter-first, tour-second" framework for generating personalized tour recommendations for tourists based on information from social media and other online data sources. Collaborative filtering is applied to identify a subset of optional points… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tourism practitioners can develop applications to monitor tourist preferences for food and their sentiment towards food providers in real-time. Mobile recommendation applications can also be developed to provide tourist with suitable dining offer while traveling (Kotiloglu et al 2017). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tourism practitioners can develop applications to monitor tourist preferences for food and their sentiment towards food providers in real-time. Mobile recommendation applications can also be developed to provide tourist with suitable dining offer while traveling (Kotiloglu et al 2017). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper [12] offers the «Filter-first, tour-second» approach for creating personalized recommendations on tourist routes, based on information from social networks and other online data sources. The collaborative filtering technique is used to define a subset of additional points of interest that maximize potential user satisfaction from the route.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of papers [4,7,9,12] does not work with context information during attraction route visiting at all, authors of paper [11] formalizes context only as user location (city and coordinates), [14] context does not contain traffic information, [10] context contains only a topological cafeterias, [5,6] does not give many details about route planning and more focusing on ontological method for attraction processing and the authors of [8] describes only a recommendation tourism system without route planning. The proposed method in system will take into account the situation on the road, including traffic jams, current weather and season, attractiveness of sights and their schedules.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the proposed structure has been assessed on information gathered from Foursquare. [1]Users are equipped for getting a genuine inclination utilizing VR. Client now invest his quality time without squandering their vitality in finding appropriate aides.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%