JPOR 2017
DOI: 10.17505/jpor.2017.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized feedback on symptom dynamics of psychopathology: A proof-of-principle study

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
99
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows the field to move from modelling cross-sectional group-level data to modelling the temporal dynamics of causal systems across time, and might bring us closer to developing novel recommendations for intervention or prevention strategies (Bos et al, 2017). Third, more attention to modelling the dynamics of causal systems also allows a renewed focus on personalized medicine, seeing that time-series network models are not limited to modelling the symptom dynamics of groups of patients, but can also be used to obtain idiographic network structures for individual patients (Epskamp, van Borkulo et al, 2017; Fisher & Boswell, 2016; Kroeze et al, 2017). Fourth, there is evidence that biological markers are differentially related to specific psychopathology symptoms (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the field to move from modelling cross-sectional group-level data to modelling the temporal dynamics of causal systems across time, and might bring us closer to developing novel recommendations for intervention or prevention strategies (Bos et al, 2017). Third, more attention to modelling the dynamics of causal systems also allows a renewed focus on personalized medicine, seeing that time-series network models are not limited to modelling the symptom dynamics of groups of patients, but can also be used to obtain idiographic network structures for individual patients (Epskamp, van Borkulo et al, 2017; Fisher & Boswell, 2016; Kroeze et al, 2017). Fourth, there is evidence that biological markers are differentially related to specific psychopathology symptoms (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with a call for more intraindividual and personbased research (Molenaar, 2004), an increasingly popular form of data pertains to n = 1 time series, in which a single individual is measured repeatedly over a period of time. One such situation is in clinical practice (Kroeze et al, 2017;Epskamp et al, 2018), where a patient can be measured several times per day over a period of a few weeks. We will limit our discussion to data obtained in a relatively short time-frame so that we can reasonably assume the model will remain stable over time.…”
Section: Temporally Ordered Data Of a Single Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESM can be used for this purpose by generating treatment‐relevant information specific for that patient that cannot be obtained by commonly used cross‐sectional assessment methods and rating scales. Previous studies using network analysis for different diseases have demonstrated that ESM data can be incorporated into a personalized treatment plan and facilitate decision‐making in a collaborative process . For PD patients, ESM data can provide insight into the relationship between different variables and symptom severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using network analysis for different diseases have demonstrated that ESM data can be incorporated into a personalized treatment plan and facilitate decision-making in a collaborative process. 15,17,21 For PD patients, ESM data can provide insight into the relationship between different variables and symptom severity. This particular network analysis focused on mood variables, but based on the specific situation of the patient, other relevant variables can be included in the network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%