2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41335-3_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personalized Best Answer Computation in Graph Databases

Abstract: Though subgraph matching has been extensively studied as a query paradigm in semantic web and social network data environments, a user can get a large number of answers in response to a query. Just like Google does, these answers can be shown to the user in accordance with an importance ranking. In this paper, we present scalable algorithms to find the top-K answers to a practically important subset of SPARQLqueries, denoted as importance queries, via a suite of pruning techniques. We test our algorithms on mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different ranking mechanisms were seamlessly and transparently integrated into the framework. In [22], Ovelgönne et al proposed a numericalterm-based ranking function to rank query results. However, only additive and multiplicative operations were considered.…”
Section: Top-k Queries In Rdf Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The different ranking mechanisms were seamlessly and transparently integrated into the framework. In [22], Ovelgönne et al proposed a numericalterm-based ranking function to rank query results. However, only additive and multiplicative operations were considered.…”
Section: Top-k Queries In Rdf Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each candidate c that contained the entity, if c was generated by other queues in prior iterations, this candidate was omitted (line 21). Otherwise, the candidate was added to the result heap, and the upper and lower bounds were updated (line [22][23][24]. If the upper bound was not greater than the lower bound, the algorithm stopped (line [25][26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ the DOGMA algorithm as a basis for our mapping algorithm. Specific top-k query processing algorithms for RDF or social network data have been proposed as well (e.g., References [32], [39], [53], and [55]). However, they are mainly interested in scoring substitutions (or projections of substitutions) without aggregation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A function providing the similarity values, for each pair of vertices in the graph, is assumed as input of the algorithm, and simple data graphs without labels are considered. Attributed graphs are instead considered in Reference [39], where Op-tIQ (Optimized Importance Query) algorithm is introduced for computing top-k answers that are obtained by ranking substitutions with user-defined scoring functions without aggregation. The STAR framework [53] reduces the computation of top-k answers to a (general) graph query to the computation of the answers to a set of star-shaped queries.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation