2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Top-k queries on RDF graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fischer et al (2009) found from a statistical analysis that magnetic elements formed via convective collapse are mostly destroyed by flux cancellation. Cancellation is also observed to play a significant role in many of the upper atmospheric dynamic phenomena such as flares, filament eruptions and coronal mass ejections (e.g., Wang et al, 1996;Zhang et al, 2001;Yardley et al, 2016), X-ray bright points (Priest et al, 1994;Harvey, 1996;Zhao et al, 2017), Ellerman bombs (Georgoulis et al, 2002;Watanabe et al, 2008;Vissers et al, 2015;Reid et al, 2016), the formation of prominences (Martin, 1988), coronal jets (Panesar et al, 2017), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fischer et al (2009) found from a statistical analysis that magnetic elements formed via convective collapse are mostly destroyed by flux cancellation. Cancellation is also observed to play a significant role in many of the upper atmospheric dynamic phenomena such as flares, filament eruptions and coronal mass ejections (e.g., Wang et al, 1996;Zhang et al, 2001;Yardley et al, 2016), X-ray bright points (Priest et al, 1994;Harvey, 1996;Zhao et al, 2017), Ellerman bombs (Georgoulis et al, 2002;Watanabe et al, 2008;Vissers et al, 2015;Reid et al, 2016), the formation of prominences (Martin, 1988), coronal jets (Panesar et al, 2017), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of (56), we may proceed by cases considering the condition (36). In a more detail, let D 1 be an RDT on R ∪ S such that R ∩ S = ∅, D 2 be an RDT on S, and D 3 be an RDT on R. Furthermore, assume that for a given r ∈ Tupl(R) and all s ∈ Tupl(S), we have that D 2 (s) > D 1 (rs) implies D 3 (r) ≤ D 1 (rs).…”
Section: Invariance Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains to prove the equality in the case when (36) does not hold. That is, assume that for given r ∈ Tupl(R) there is s ∈ Tupl(S) such that D 2 (s) > D 1 (rs) and D 3 (r) > D 1 (rs).…”
Section: Invariance Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, when the right-side index is large, the performance of rank join suffers. In another framework introduced by Wang et al [36], quantitative entities in the RDF dataset are separated out into an MS-tree index. In the first step of query processing, candidate entities are located using the MS-tree index that are then used as seeds for performing breadth-first (BFS) traversals over the graph to find matching sub-graphs.…”
Section: Top-k Queries On Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%