1986
DOI: 10.2307/3791126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality Profiles of American Presidents as Revealed in Their Public Statements: The Presidential News Conferences of Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data in Table 4 was therefore evaluated for changes in Hussein's levels of anger and anxiety as the best overt indicators of these underlying processes. Weintraub (1986) identified several parts of speech that were associated with anger in his clinical populations. Negatives include words of negation such as "no," "not," and "never."…”
Section: Research Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data in Table 4 was therefore evaluated for changes in Hussein's levels of anger and anxiety as the best overt indicators of these underlying processes. Weintraub (1986) identified several parts of speech that were associated with anger in his clinical populations. Negatives include words of negation such as "no," "not," and "never."…”
Section: Research Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The five interviews published in the Foreign Broadcast Information Service publication on Iraq were coded according to criteria described by Weintraub (1986Weintraub ( , 1989 and Hermann (1980) by a research associate trained in these methods. The results for the Weintraub measures are displayed in Table 4.…”
Section: Research Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downloaded by [Nanyang Technological University] at 01:01 27 August 2015 Schafer and Crichlow (1996: 420 Two broad strategies are generally used in selecting material to be coded. Some researchers (Winter et al, 1991;Walker, Schafer and Young, 1998;Tetlock, 1984) use prepared speeches while others rely on spontaneous comments in the form of press conferences or interviews (Hermann, 1974(Hermann, , 1980(Hermann, ,1984Weintraub, 1986;Winter et al, 1991). I believe that using prepared speeches is most appropriate for constructs that are heavily dependent upon context and situation, where such comments demonstrate role conceptions and formally derived position statements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The coding decisions for the study by Herek, Janis and Huth are presented in Table II. I developed several criteria and decision rules for gathering data on the personality variables. Following in the tradition of linguistic analysis (see Hermann, 1974Hermann, , 1980Hermann, , 1983Hermann, , 1984Hermann, , 1987Suedfeld and Tetlock, 1977;Tetlock, 1981Tetlock, , 1983Tetlock, , 1984Walker, Schafer and Young, 1998;Weintraub, 1986;Winter, , 1993Winter and Stewart, 1977), all of the operationalized personality variables in this study are measured from a distance and require use of text material. That is, I infer trait information about a president based on linguistic patterns from publicly-made comments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While its variables are derived, in part, from content analysis approaches to leadership analysis (Hermann, 1980;Shaw, 2003;Weintraub, 1986;Winter, Hermann, Weintraub, and Walker, 1991), personality, and threat assessment (Shaw, 2006), it has mainly been used to:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%