Personality Factors of the Cattell “16 PF Test” and Hypnotic Susceptibility

Hartman, Bernard J.

doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.19.3f.1337

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Inleiding Dit blyk uit die literatuur dat nog weinig navorsing gedoen is ten opsigte van die voorspelling van hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid. Sommige studies (Barber, 1956;Hartman, 1966;Levitt, Brady & Lubin, 1963;Weitzenhoffer & Weitzenhoffer, 1958) het aangetoon dat daar'n beduidende verband bestaan tussen hipnotiseerbaarheid en bepaalde persoonlikheidsfaktore. Die resultate van hierdie studies is egter teenstrydig.…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Die voorspelling van hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid op grond van persoonlikheidsveranderlikes

Bester¹,

Grobler²

1983

South African Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The predictability of hypnotic suggestibility on the basis of personality variables. According to the literature little research has been done on the prediction of hypnotic suggestibility. The results reported in the literature concerning personality factors and hypnotic suggestibility have largely been contradictory. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the personality variables which correlate significantly with hypnotizability (as indicated by the literature) can be used as predictors of hypnotic suggestibility. The subjects consisted of 60 undergraduate psychology majors (18 males, 42 females) who were administered the Cattell 16-PF Test. To assess hypnotic suggestibility an adaptation of the Body Sway Test (Weitzenhoffer & Hilgard, 1962) was used. No significant relationship was found between hypnotic suggestibility and the different personality variables. It would seem that the personality variables indicated by literature and measured by the 16-PF Test are not accurate predictors of hypnotic suggestibility.S. Atr. J. Psychol. 1983, 13: 140 -142 Dlt blyk uit die Iiteratuur dat daar nog min navorsing gedoen is ten opsigte van die voorspelling van hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid. Die resultate ten opsigte van persoonlikheidsfaktore en hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid wat in die literatuur vermeld word, is bale teenstrydig. Die doel met die studie was om vas te stel of persoonlikheidsfaktore wat volgens die literatuur beduidend met hipnotiseerbaarheid korreleer as voorspellers vir hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid gebruik kan word. Sestig voorgraadse senior sielkundestudente (18 mans en 42 dames) is as proefpersone gebruik. Cattell se 16-Persoonlikheidsfaktorevraelys is toegepas. 'n Aangepaste vorm van die Liggaamswaaitoets (Weitzenhoffer & Hilgard, 19(2) is gebruik om hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid te bepaal. Hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid het nie met een van die onafhanlike veranderlikes beduidend korreleer nie. Oit blyk dat die persoonlikheidsveranderlikes wat op grond van die Iiteratuur geselekteer is en wat deur die 16-PF gemeet is, nie akkurate voorspellers van hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid is nie.

show abstract

unclassified

“…Hartman (1966) het 14 mansstudente en 8 damesstudente aan die 16-Persoonlikheidsfaktorvraelys en die 'Barber Suggestibility Scale' onderwerp. 'n Beduidende positiewe verband is tussen hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid en die persoonlikheidstrekke entoesiasme en veiligheid identifiseer.…”

unclassified

Die voorspelling van hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid op grond van persoonlikheidsveranderlikes

Bester¹,

Grobler²

1983

South African Journal of Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Analysis of the college teachers’ classroom teaching charm based on gender

Wei,

Yue

2023

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From a gender perspective, this research utilized questionnaires administered to college students and faculty, and applied statistical analysis to investigate the shared perceptions of both groups regarding teachers’ language, demeanor, and appearance. Additionally, the study evaluated the impact of these factors on the perceived charisma of instructors during classroom sessions. Results indicate that female instructors are perceived as more charismatic than their male counterparts. A teacher’s linguistic charm can enhance students’ critical thinking skills, and those with a visually appealing presence tend to captivate students more effectively. In terms of charismatic classroom behaviors, male instructors exhibit less expressiveness in facial cues compared to female instructors. However, male instructors excel in modulating their vocal pitch during lectures. When juxtaposing eye contact with gesturing, educators often prefer gesturing to convey teaching charisma. Furthermore, the act of moving around the classroom by teachers can lead to perceptual disparities between students and instructors.

show abstract

Personality Factors of the Cattell “16 PF Test” and Hypnotic Susceptibility

Cited by 2 publications

References 4 publications

Die voorspelling van hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid op grond van persoonlikheidsveranderlikes

Die voorspelling van hipnotiese suggereerbaarheid op grond van persoonlikheidsveranderlikes

Analysis of the college teachers’ classroom teaching charm based on gender

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About