Personality and Sexual Risk Taking: A Quantitative Review

Abstract

Findings from a quantitative review of the empirical research literature on normal personality and sexual risk taking are reported. The review focuses on domains identified in major models of normal personality representing the psychobiological and taxonomic perspectives. Focal sexual risk-taking behaviors were number of partners, unprotected sex, and high-risk sexual encounters (e.g., sex with a stranger). A comprehensive search produced 53 studies relevant to the review. A striking feature of the results is the paucity of research on domains of normal personality and sexual risk taking for all domains other than sensation seeking, which accounted for 64% of the effect sizes. The preponderance of studies (81%) took the psychobiological perspective and were published since 1990 (75%). Among the substantive findings were effects for sensation seeking, impulsivity, and agreeableness on all sexual risk-taking behaviors considered. Additionally, there were effects on specific behaviors for neuroticism and conscientiousness. The implications of these findings for future research on normal personality and sexual risk taking are discussed.

The Tridimensional Structure of Sociosexuality: Spanish Validation of the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory

“…Some individual traits have also been related to sociosexuality. For example, an association has been found between sexual sensation-seeking, as the variety of partners and experiences are key elements of this construct (Hoyle, Fejfar, & Miller, 2000;Paul et al, 2000). The relation between sociosexuality other variables such as self-esteem, depression, and sexual preoccupation is not clear (Vrangalova & Ong, 2014).…”

UPPS-P model impulsivity and marijuana use behaviors in adolescents: A meta-analysis

“…Searches were conducted based on all keyword combinations of terms for impulsivity and marijuana-related behaviors (Term 1: impuls*, urgen*, sensation seeking; Term 2: marijuana, THC, cannabis; Term 3: adolesc*, youth, teen), as used in previous reviews (e.g., Coskunpinar et al, 2013;Dir et al, 2014;Hoyle et al, 2000). The present study included both published and unpublished (dissertations) articles.…”

Personality and Self‐Regulation

“…Impulsive behaviors typically are quick, often inappropriate, and frequently risky. People who are highly impulsive are prone to a host of high-risk behaviors characterized by poor self-control (e.g., Hoyle, Fejfar, & Miller, 2000;Krueger, Caspi, Moffitt, White, & Slouthamer-Loeber, 1996;Wulfert, Block, Ana, Rodriguez, & Colsman, 2002). Although impulsivity can be assessed, and often is studied, as a trait, it also appears as a constituent of broader traits and domains of personality such as extraversion and psychoticism in the P-E-N model (Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism; Eysenck, 1990), conscientiousness in the five-factor model (Costa & McCrae, 1992), impulsive sensation seeking in the alternative five-factor model (Zuckerman, Kuhlman, Joireman, Teta, & Kraft, 1993), and the behavioral approach system in Gray's (1994) neurophysiological model.…”