1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00978.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personality and Health: Advantages and Limitations of the Five‐Factor Model

Abstract: Interest in the association between personality characteristics and physical health has been renewed in recent years. Theory and research in this area has also been complicated by conceptual and methodological limitations. The present article briefly reviews this literature and discusses the advantages and limitations of the five-factor model of personality as an integrating framework for studies of personality and health. The model has already been fruitfully applied in several contexts, and more possibilitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
127
0
6

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
6
127
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This study supports the findings of previous studies that personality and mood factors predict QoL over and above other, more objective factors [29,33,35,61]. Depressive mood state plays a particularly important role in these groups, as does the personality trait Emotional Stability, both of which corroborate previous research [6,32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This study supports the findings of previous studies that personality and mood factors predict QoL over and above other, more objective factors [29,33,35,61]. Depressive mood state plays a particularly important role in these groups, as does the personality trait Emotional Stability, both of which corroborate previous research [6,32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…That is, whereas stress activates the sympathetic nervous system, an opposite trigger may decrease sympathetic system activity (Rabin et al, 1994), and promote optimal functioning. Empirical support for this notion is evident in personality research, which has demonstrated that negative traits, such as neuroticism and hostility, relate to increased mortality risk and poor health outcomes (e.g., Smith, 2006;Smith, Glazer, Ruiz, & Gallo, 2004;Smith & Williams, 1992;Suls & Bunde, 2005;Watson & Pennebaker, 1989), whereas positive traits, such as optimism, extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, relate to decreased mortality risk and better health (Friedman et al, 1993;Hampson, Goldberg, Vogt, & Dubanoski, 2006). Because of the strong correlation between personality traits and SWB, similar mechanisms may characterize the relations between well-being and health (Pressman & Cohen, 2005;Ryff & Singer, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is currently a large body of research activity applying the FFM to diverse and important realms of inquiry including psychotherapy (Miller,199 I), psychopathology (e.g., Widiger & Trull, 1992;Wiggins & Pincus, 1989), clinical assessment (e.g., Costa & McCrae, 1992a, 1992bMuten, 1991), health psychology (Smith & Williams, 1992), job performance (Barrick & Mount, 1991), and close relationships (Buss, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%