2007
DOI: 10.1080/17437190701492486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health benefits: Meta-analytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
334
1
26

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 508 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 227 publications
(131 reference statements)
15
334
1
26
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in a sample of nursing professionals, affect balance was positively related to conscientiousness and negatively related to neuroticism (González et al, 2014). Yet very few studies have explored the link between affect balance and health (e.g., Howell, Kern, & Lyubomirsky, 2007), and none have done so in the context of personality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in a sample of nursing professionals, affect balance was positively related to conscientiousness and negatively related to neuroticism (González et al, 2014). Yet very few studies have explored the link between affect balance and health (e.g., Howell, Kern, & Lyubomirsky, 2007), and none have done so in the context of personality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important implication is that an individual is only completely healthy when he or she experiences both low levels of psychopathological symptoms and a good state of well-being. Moreover, positive mental health may have effects on individual and social functioning that are independent from the effects of psychopathology (Howell, Kern, & Lyubomirsky, 2007; Pressman & Cohen, 2005; Veenhoven, 2008). Crucially, both reduction of symptoms and promotion of well-being are needed for complete mental health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the health benefits of positive affect are being established (Chida & Steptoe, 2008;Howell, Kern, & Lyubomirsky, 2007; Steptoe, Dockray, & Wardle, 2009), and evidence to suggest that C may be positively related to positive affect is emerging (Besser & Shackelford, 2007;Nater, Hoppmann, & Klumb, 2010;Zellars, Perrewe, Hochwarter & Anderson, 2006). Therefore, it is possible that C could exert its protective effect through either the experience of fewer negative health outcomes or the experience of more positive health outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the daily level, positive affect has been shown to have a beneficial influence on physiological processes such as cortisol levels and ambulatory blood pressure (Steptoe & Wardle, 2005). Recent reviews suggest that positive affect can have significant effects on health both at the daily level and in the longer term with an effect size comparable to negative affect (Chida & Steptoe, 2008;Howell et al, 2007;Steptoe et al, 2009). Therefore, affect may represent an important additional mechanism through which C may influence both ongoing and future health; if daily hassles lead low C individuals to experience more negative affect or less positive affect, these individuals may experience ill-health consequences of negative affect, and/or fail to experience the health benefits of positive affect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%