Personalistic View of John Paul II on the Humanizing Function of Art in the Context of Dialogue between the Church and Artists

Abstract

This article presents the way John Paul II, the head of the Vatican at the beginning of the third millennium, theologically and philosophically substantiates and establishes the principles of a new humanism through the dialogue between the Church and art as the most personalized sphere of human activity. The conceptual essence of the key idea of the humanizing function of art, in the personalistic philosophy of art of John Paul II is revealed from the methodological standpoint of religious studies. It determines the particular nature and tasks of the renewed dialogue between the Church and artists, aimed to overcome the processes of depersonalization and dehumanization of culture, caused by atheistic humanism and growing increasingly during the 20th century. The author ponders on The Letter of Pope John Paul II to Artists and Towards a Pastoral Approach to Culture, two papal documents. Their appearance on the eve of the 2000th anniversary of Christianity became symbolic. These documents draw attention because, firstly, although the idea of a dialogue between the Church and artists as a way of embodying spiritual values of a new humanism in the theological and philosophical discourse of John Paul II had been formed over several decades, it found its conceptual solution precisely in these two papal documents. Secondly, it is in these two documents that the essence of the cultural policy of the 264th Pope is consistently set forth, meant to overcome the consequences of atheistic humanism and create a new humanism, and thus to overcome the civilizational anthropological crisis and develop a new ideological paradigm of the third millennium.

Self-Education Into Maturity in Light of the Theoretical Approach of Zdzisław Chlewiński

“…One of the areas in which John Paul II is manifested as a personal role model in self-education towards maturity is his attitude towards suffering and vulnerable people, those who rely on the assistance of others. In this regard, he showed the sense and importance of the personalistic norm under which the dignity of the human being, including a sick, less able, person in need of help, should be protected in all circumstances (Gorban, 2022;Kamau, Ikpe, Kitonga, 2020). During his pastoral visits, especially to patients, he felt it was his responsibility to stand courageously in front of the sick and empathise with them in their pain.…”