2014
DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.132115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Personal Moral Norms and Attitudes Toward Endangered Species Policies on Private Land

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study of landowners in rural southern Ontario, Olive and McCune () found that those interviewed held a strong opinion that preventing extinction was a moral responsibility. This is similar to results in a study by Raymond and Schneider () which suggested that moral arguments to prevent extinction are widely supported and are influential predictors of support for policies to protect species at risk on private land. Similar to that study, PEI rural private landowners also supported an ecological justification for protecting species at risk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their study of landowners in rural southern Ontario, Olive and McCune () found that those interviewed held a strong opinion that preventing extinction was a moral responsibility. This is similar to results in a study by Raymond and Schneider () which suggested that moral arguments to prevent extinction are widely supported and are influential predictors of support for policies to protect species at risk on private land. Similar to that study, PEI rural private landowners also supported an ecological justification for protecting species at risk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Personal and moral norms to prevent extinction have also been found to play an important role in shaping landowners’ attitudes and behaviour towards endangered species (Raymond and Schneider ). A study in Ontario found that rural landowners perceived a moral responsibility to prevent extinction of other species, although they had little knowledge of endangered species in their area or programs available to help landowners steward them (Olive and McCune ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experience of a personal obligation to conservation could be consistent with a conservative political leaning and with a high score on traditionalism, if a landowner can achieve conservation without participation in a governmental program (Raymond and Schneider 2014). This finding is consistent with the results by Olive and Raymond (2010) who found that politically conservative opinions about property rights do not have to be in opposition to positive norms regarding species-at-risk protection, and with Blankenau et al (2007) who found strong support for environmental conservation among political conservatives as well as liberal party followers in the USA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different from our study in which the contributions of the different elements are compared, Bieling (2004) combined all concepts/models into one new model and did not assess the contributions of the individual parts. Although social-psychological concepts such as values, norms, and attitudes have been utilized in other studies (e.g., Moon et al 2012, Raymond and Schneider 2014, Kusmanoff et al 2016), they have not been systematically applied to the same data set and their individual contributions investigated in this way. The results of our study illustrate the complex relationships among basic values, worldviews, norms, attitudes, and behaviors emphasizing the importance of proenvironmental worldviews, i.e., NEP, and of formal education for increasing the likelihood of enrolment in a government-sponsored PLC program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some groups view the protection of the planet as a personal responsibility and a moral obligation [ 32 ]. For example, some private landowners in the U.S. feel a moral obligation to prevent the extinction of endangered animals [ 33 ] and many households in Sweden feel a moral obligation to recycle [ 34 ]. Moral norms have received less attention than descriptive and injunctive norms in tests of environmental messaging and may offer a powerful force for promoting environmental actions [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%