2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009gl041108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistent englacial drainage features in the Greenland Ice Sheet

Abstract: [1] Surface melting on the Greenland Ice Sheet is common up to $1400 m elevation and, in extreme melt years, even higher. Water produced on the ice sheet surface collects in lakes and drains over the ice sheet surface via supraglacial streams and through the ice sheet via moulins. Water delivered to the base of the ice sheet can cause uplift and enhanced sliding locally. Here we use ice-penetrating radar data to observe the effects of significant basal melting coincident with moulins and calculate how much bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
142
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
142
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems likely however that these features are largely vertical through inference from a number of lines of evidence including (i) field-based ice-penetrating radar studies [50], (ii) surface uplift in close proximity to the lake that occurs immediately following rapid lake drainage events [9,41,55] and (iii) the expectation that the physics of hydrofracture will most efficiently drive crevasses vertically from the ice surface to the bed [48]. Furthermore, it seems likely that moulins will be hydraulically efficient once formed, with turbulent and high velocity flow, in order to generate the high frictional melt rates required to prevent the closure of the englacial channels (or 'pipes') at depth where ice is often > 500 m thick.…”
Section: Englacial Meltwater Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems likely however that these features are largely vertical through inference from a number of lines of evidence including (i) field-based ice-penetrating radar studies [50], (ii) surface uplift in close proximity to the lake that occurs immediately following rapid lake drainage events [9,41,55] and (iii) the expectation that the physics of hydrofracture will most efficiently drive crevasses vertically from the ice surface to the bed [48]. Furthermore, it seems likely that moulins will be hydraulically efficient once formed, with turbulent and high velocity flow, in order to generate the high frictional melt rates required to prevent the closure of the englacial channels (or 'pipes') at depth where ice is often > 500 m thick.…”
Section: Englacial Meltwater Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some meltwater is stored in supraglacial lakes, once the winter snowpack has been removed, the majority of surface meltwater is transported across the ice sheet surface in efficient supraglacial stream networks prior to delivery to crevasses and moulins [5,44,49] (near vertical pipes [50] that drain water through the ice). An extensive study across a 6812 km 2 area of the SW Greenland ice sheet betweeñ 1000-1500 m elevation [49], encompassing 523 channels that terminated in moulins, obtained mean moulin discharge of 3.15 m 3 s −1 (with a maximum of 17.7 m 3 s −1 ).…”
Section: Supraglacial Meltwater Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…underlain by cold ice). In this $4 km portion of the flowline, we assume that ice temperature is sufficiently heterogeneous to allow the persistence of englacial conduits (Catania and Neumann, 2010). We treat the discharge of these conduits in an identical manner to the conduits downstream of the equilibrium line, except we suspend the processes that govern the transient rate of change of conduit storage volume, @S c /@t, and prescribe conduit radii as constant (5 cm).…”
Section: Datasets and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mernild, Mote, & Liston, 2011;Rignot, Velicogna, van den Broeke, Monaghan, & Lenaerts, 2011), a large amount of research has recently been directed at furthering our understanding of how the routing and arrangement of meltwater interacts with ice flow (e.g. Catania & Neumann, 2010;Parizek, Alley, Dupont, Walker, & Anandakrishnan, 2010;Schoof, 2010;Sundal et al, 2011). However, our current understanding of meltwater drainage systems beneath the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets is limited by the difficulty in accessing their # 2013 The Author(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%