2013
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2013.815591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A map of large Canadian eskers from Landsat satellite imagery

Abstract: Meltwater drainage systems beneath ice sheets are a poorly understood, yet fundamentally important environment for understanding glacier dynamics, which are strongly influenced by the nature and quantity of meltwater entering the subglacial system. Contemporary sub-ice sheet meltwater drainage systems are notoriously difficult to study, but we can utilise exposed beds of palaeo-ice sheets to further our understanding of subglacial drainage. In particular, eskers record deposition in glacial drainage channels a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(95 reference statements)
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is achieved using a GIS dataset of eskers mapped from Landsat 7 ETMþ imagery of the whole of Canada, and covering almost 10,000,000 km 2 formerly occupied by the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS). These data are available as a map (Storrar et al, 2013), and were recently used to identify changes in esker density which may be associated with climatic changes (Storrar et al, 2014). Here, we build on this work and analyse esker patterns, distribution, length, fragmentation, sinuosity, spacing, tributaries, 'stream' ordering and slope, thereby providing an important dataset for testing both conceptual and numerical models of esker formation and providing new insights into channelised meltwater drainage at the ice sheet scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is achieved using a GIS dataset of eskers mapped from Landsat 7 ETMþ imagery of the whole of Canada, and covering almost 10,000,000 km 2 formerly occupied by the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS). These data are available as a map (Storrar et al, 2013), and were recently used to identify changes in esker density which may be associated with climatic changes (Storrar et al, 2014). Here, we build on this work and analyse esker patterns, distribution, length, fragmentation, sinuosity, spacing, tributaries, 'stream' ordering and slope, thereby providing an important dataset for testing both conceptual and numerical models of esker formation and providing new insights into channelised meltwater drainage at the ice sheet scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They are common in formerly warm-based glaciated terrains (e.g. Prest et al, 1968;Clark et al, 2004;Aylsworth et al, 2012;Storrar et al, 2013), making them a useful indicator of subglacial meltwater drainage pathways. Meltwater drainage beneath ice sheets is of fundamental importance to our understanding of ice dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River mouths formerly near (or under) thick ice have more variable sealevel histories, illustrating the divergent GIA histories result from different ice-sheet and solid-Earth models. and the mapped Canadian eskers from Storrar et al (2013). As there are few chronological controls on when these ice streams were active, ice divides are simply drawn between diverging ice streams.…”
Section: Methods: Data-driven Drainage Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carlson et al, 2009;Storrar, Stokes, & Evans, 2014a) and produced a large geomorphological imprint (e.g. Brennand, 2000;Brennand & Shaw, 1994;Mullins & Hinchey, 1989;Prest, Grant, & Rampton, 1968;Storrar, Stokes, & Evans, 2013), the geomorphological record of meltwater has to date played only a relatively minor role in ice sheet reconstructions. This is typically limited to providing supplementary information about ice geometries and flow direction (Kleman & Borgström, 1996), rather than to reconstruct basal and hydrological processes in space and time (see review by Greenwood, Clason, Helanow, & Margold, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%