2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10393-010-0327-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Persistence with Chytridiomycosis Does Not Assure Survival of Direct-developing Frogs

Abstract: The chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) has been linked to extinction and decline of numerous amphibians. We studied the population-level effects of Bd in two post-decline anuran species, Eleutherodactylus coqui and E. portoricensis, at El Yunque National Forest, Puerto Rico. Data on amphibian abundance was updated to report long-term population trends. Mark-recapture data was used to monitor Bd-infection status and estimate survival probabilities of infected versus uninfected adults. Prevalenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on some amphibian-Bd systems have reported similar results: surveyors have observed chytridiomycosis-induced mortality in the field but subsequent CMR studies have found no evidence that Bd infection reduced frog survival (Retallick et al 2004;Voordouw et al 2010). In contrast, studies on other species have found the expected negative effects of Bd infection on frog survival (Murray et al 2009;Longo and Burrowes 2010;Pilliod et al 2010). The lack of a negative effect of Bd on the populationlevel survival of L. rheocola seems paradoxical because some individual frogs are killed by chytridiomycosis at lowland sites in the Wet Tropics (Woodhams and Alford 2005;Phillott et al 2013).…”
Section: Survival Ratementioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies on some amphibian-Bd systems have reported similar results: surveyors have observed chytridiomycosis-induced mortality in the field but subsequent CMR studies have found no evidence that Bd infection reduced frog survival (Retallick et al 2004;Voordouw et al 2010). In contrast, studies on other species have found the expected negative effects of Bd infection on frog survival (Murray et al 2009;Longo and Burrowes 2010;Pilliod et al 2010). The lack of a negative effect of Bd on the populationlevel survival of L. rheocola seems paradoxical because some individual frogs are killed by chytridiomycosis at lowland sites in the Wet Tropics (Woodhams and Alford 2005;Phillott et al 2013).…”
Section: Survival Ratementioning
confidence: 65%
“…For example, populations of the Australian hylid frog Litoria wilcoxii have a high prevalence of Bd but infection has no negative effect on adult survival in this species (Kriger and Hero 2006). In other species, however, survival of infected individuals can be lower than uninfected individuals (Murray et al 2009;Longo and Burrowes 2010;Pilliod et al 2010). Thus, the effects of infection by Bd are species-specific, and there are some species in which the host-pathogen relationship has apparently changed.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The infection was associated with juveniles; juveniles had higher prevalence than adults, and populations with Bd had more juveniles than other populations. Several hypotheses might explain this association between population structure and presence of Bd infection: densitydependence (Briggs et al 2010), greater in fectivity of juveniles (Kriger et al 2007, Longo & Burrowes 2010, or pathogen-induced change of behavior making juveniles stay near water rather than dispersing into the terrestrial habitat. Most juveniles were not infected, so the latter is a less likely explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, a range of responses to infection occurs within species as well, with differences in susceptibility arising between individuals and populations. This may be driven by body condition (Beldomenico & Begon 2010;Ramsey et al 2010), age or life stage (Longo & Burrowes 2010), and the capacity of the host to thermally acclimate relative to the pathogen , or behaviourally thermoregulate (Richards-Zawacki 2010), in given environmental conditions. In addition, body size is thought to influence susceptibility within species, with smaller animals succumbing to Bd infection faster (Carey et al 2006;).…”
Section: Variation In Susceptibility To Chytridiomycosismentioning
confidence: 99%