2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4870917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perpendicular spin transfer torque magnetic random access memories with high spin torque efficiency and thermal stability for embedded applications (invited)

Abstract: Magnetic random access memories based on the spin transfer torque phenomenon (STT-MRAMs) have become one of the leading candidates for next generation memory applications. Among the many attractive features of this technology are its potential for high speed and endurance, read signal margin, low power consumption, scalability, and non-volatility. In this paper, we discuss our recent results on perpendicular STT-MRAM stack designs that show STT efficiency higher than 5 kBT/μA, energy barriers higher than 100 k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pinna et al 13 reported that, in a system with uniaxial anisotropy, n = 2 is a much better fit to the data at long time scales than n = 1, and the crossover regime between deterministic and thermal effects could span very large switching timescales. However, Liu et al 14 used n = 1 following the effective temperature argument, while Thomas et al 15 argued that n = 1 provides a better fit to their experimental data than n = 2. Fitting experimental data with equations (3) and (4) using n = 1 or n = 2 leads to large discrepancies in the values of ∆ as discussed below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinna et al 13 reported that, in a system with uniaxial anisotropy, n = 2 is a much better fit to the data at long time scales than n = 1, and the crossover regime between deterministic and thermal effects could span very large switching timescales. However, Liu et al 14 used n = 1 following the effective temperature argument, while Thomas et al 15 argued that n = 1 provides a better fit to their experimental data than n = 2. Fitting experimental data with equations (3) and (4) using n = 1 or n = 2 leads to large discrepancies in the values of ∆ as discussed below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b Next, we determine the values of H K using simple thermal activation model for single domain particles. 32,33 According to this model, by fitting the switching probability, P as a function of field H, one can estimate the values of the anisotropy field H K and the thermal stability ∆. The switching probability is given by…”
Section: (C)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetostatic interaction between layers is largely offset by the exchange and not included here. The objective of this design is to maximize the switching efficiency ξ-the existing figure of merit: [8][9][10] …”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%