Perovskite Solar Cells with Carbon‐Based Electrodes – Quantification of Losses and Strategies to Overcome Them

Abstract

Carbon‐based electrodes represent a promising approach to improve stability and up‐scalability of perovskite photovoltaics. The temperature at which these contacts are processed defines the absorber grain size of the perovskite solar cell: in cells with low‐temperature carbon‐based electrodes (L‐CPSCs), layer‐by‐layer deposition is possible, allowing perovskite crystals to be large (>100 nm), while in cells with high‐temperature carbon‐based contacts (H‐CPSCs), crystals are constrained to 10–20 nm in size. To enhance the power conversion efficiency of these devices, the main loss mechanisms are identified for both systems. Measurements of charge carrier lifetime, quasi‐Fermi level splitting (QFLS) and light‐intensity‐dependent behavior, supported by numerical simulations, clearly demonstrate that H‐CPSCs strongly suffer from non‐radiative losses in the perovskite absorber, primarily due to numerous grain boundaries. In contrast, large crystals of L‐CPSCs provide a long carrier lifetime (1.8 µs) and exceptionally high QFLS of 1.21 eV for an absorber bandgap of 1.6 eV. These favorable characteristics explain the remarkable open‐circuit voltage of over 1.1 V in hole‐selective layer‐free L‐CPSCs. However, the low photon absorption and poor charge transport in these cells limit their potential. Finally, effective strategies are provided to reduce non‐radiative losses in H‐CPSCs, transport losses in L‐CPSCs, and to improve photon management in both cell types.

Stabilization of Perovskite Solar Cells: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives

“…Figure illustrates both low‐ and high‐temperature processible carbon‐electrode‐based PSCs with/without a HSL. [ 218 ]…”

Electrode dependence in halide perovskite memories: resistive switching behaviours

“…Thus, HP RS memories should explore these alternatives such as carbonaceous electrodes (graphene, carbon), which have been recently established in HP photovoltaics as they offer cheaper solutions in reducing electrode costs. [126][127][128] 3. When employing the selected design structure, how does the choice of electrode material affect RS characteristics?…”

“…Thus, HP RS memories should explore these alternatives such as carbonaceous electrodes (graphene, carbon), which have been recently established in HP photovoltaics as they offer cheaper solutions in reducing electrode costs. 126–128…”

Counter electrodes for perovskite solar cells: materials, interfaces and device stability

“…116 Recent work demonstrated that the major limiting factor for carbon-based counter electrodes in perovskite solar cells is the severe performance losses at the counter electrode interfaces. 117 Kim and coworkers developed a two dimensional perovskite electron blocking layer in hole-conductor free devices in order to reduce the charge losses at interfaces, which enables a promising PCE of 18.5%. 118…”