1998
DOI: 10.1080/10934529809376788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permeation sampling of halogenated ether priority pollutants

Abstract: A method for the determination of five halogenated ether priority pollutants using time-weighted-average concentrations is described. These compounds permeate through a silicone polycarbonate membrane and are trapped onto a Tenax TA™ adsorbent. Compounds of interest are solvent desorbed by acetone, followed by separation and quantitation by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A linear relationship was found between the amount of halogenated ether trapped onto the Tenax adsorbent and the product of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect has been investigated for other types of passive sampling systems. 21,27,42 An Arrhenius relationship has been established over the temperature range of 18±24 ³C for the accumulation rate of phenanthrene by the semi-permeable membrane device (SPMD) in which the analyte diffuses through a polyethylene membrane into an arti®cial lipid receiving phase. 21 Sampling rates of PCBs by the PISCES sampling system comprising a polyethylene enclosed hexane receiving phase have been quoted to vary between 0.41 l day 21 at 10 ³C and 0.92 l day 21 at 20 ³C.…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting Passive Sampling Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect has been investigated for other types of passive sampling systems. 21,27,42 An Arrhenius relationship has been established over the temperature range of 18±24 ³C for the accumulation rate of phenanthrene by the semi-permeable membrane device (SPMD) in which the analyte diffuses through a polyethylene membrane into an arti®cial lipid receiving phase. 21 Sampling rates of PCBs by the PISCES sampling system comprising a polyethylene enclosed hexane receiving phase have been quoted to vary between 0.41 l day 21 at 10 ³C and 0.92 l day 21 at 20 ³C.…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting Passive Sampling Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Arrhenius relationships have also been evaluated for halogenated ether compounds in a system with XAD resin as receiving phase and a polycarbonate membrane. 42 The effects of temperature on the passive sampler are not easy to model analytically because of the complexity of the system, which comprises an unstirred boundary layer of water, a polymeric membrane, and an organic receiving phase. Under stagnant conditions, such as those found at the sediment surface, the boundary layer is typically of the order of 1 mm thick but in faster ¯owing waters this would be much smaller, estimated to be in the range 0.1±0.001 mm.…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting Passive Sampling Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have in common a receiving phase with a high affinity for the target species, which is separated from the aquatic environment by a diffusion limiting barrier. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] These devices are based on the principles of Fickian diffusion, and a diffusion gradient is maintained across the diffusion limiting barrier by using a receiving phase with a high affinity for the analyte being monitored. A range of receiving phases have been employed in these devices, including l-hexane 2 and triolein lipids 4 and a bound C 18 chromatographic phase 7 for organic compounds, and chelating resins, 1 disks and ion-exchange gels 8,9 for inorganic species.…”
Section: Aim Of Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured value for a batch case is calculated from eqn. (6) and is also presented in Table 2. Both the calculated value in pure water from eqn.…”
Section: Single and Double Diffusion Limiting Membranementioning
confidence: 99%