Permeation of hydrogen through nickel foils: surface reaction rates at low temperatures

Altunoglu, A. K.; Blackburn, D. A.; Braithwaite, Nicholas; Grant, David M.

doi:10.1016/0022-5088(91)90195-a

Cited by 22 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Perujo, Serra, and colleagues used the method of 'reverse permeation' to obtain values for RAFM steels [120][121][122], austenitic steels [123], Inconel 625 [123], and Incoloy 800 alloys [124]. Grant and colleagues developed a method of pressure modulation and applied it to pure Ni and Ni-Th alloys [125] and stainless steel 304 [126]. Hatano and colleagues [127,128] used an UHV chamber with O 2 dosing capabilities to measure surface constants at low pressure for V and Nb.…”

Section: Tritium Permeation and Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physics and technology considerations for the deuterium–tritium fuel cycle and conditions for tritium fuel self sufficiency

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The tritium aspects of the DT fuel cycle embody some of the most challenging feasibility and attractiveness issues in the development of fusion systems. The review and analyses in this paper provide important information to understand and quantify these challenges and to define the phase space of plasma physics and fusion technology parameters and features that must guide a serious R&D in the world fusion program. We focus in particular on components, issues and R&D necessary to satisfy three ‘principal requirements’: (1) achieving tritium self-sufficiency within the fusion system, (2) providing a tritium inventory for the initial start-up of a fusion facility, and (3) managing the safety and biological hazards of tritium. A primary conclusion is that the physics and technology state-of-the-art will not enable DEMO and future power plants to satisfy these principal requirements. We quantify goals and define specific areas and ideas for physics and technology R&D to meet these requirements. A powerful fuel cycle dynamics model was developed to calculate time-dependent tritium inventories and flow rates in all parts and components of the fuel cycle for different ranges of parameters and physics and technology conditions. Dynamics modeling analyses show that the key parameters affecting tritium inventories, tritium start-up inventory, and tritium self-sufficiency are the tritium burn fraction in the plasma (f b), fueling efficiency (η f), processing time of plasma exhaust in the inner fuel cycle (t p), reactor availability factor (AF), reserve time (t r) which determines the reserve tritium inventory needed in the storage system in order to keep the plant operational for time t r in case of any malfunction of any part of the tritium processing system, and the doubling time (t d). Results show that η f f b > 2% and processing time of 1–4 h are required to achieve tritium self-sufficiency with reasonable confidence. For η f f b = 2% and processing time of 4 h, the tritium start-up inventory required for a 3 GW fusion reactor is ∼11 kg, while it is <5 kg if η f f b = 5% and the processing time is 1 h. To achieve these stringent requirements, a serious R&D program in physics and technology is necessary. The EU-DEMO direct internal recycling concept that carries fuel directly from the plasma exhaust gas to the fueling systems without going through the isotope separation system reduces the overall processing time and tritium inventories and has positive effects on the required tritium breeding ratio (TBRR). A significant finding is the strong dependence of tritium self-sufficiency on the reactor availability factor. Simulations show that tritium self-sufficiency is: impossible if AF < 10% for any η f f b, possible if AF > 30% and 1% ⩽ η f f b ⩽ 2%, and achievable with reasonable confidence if AF > 50% and η f f b > 2%. These results are of particular concern in light of the low availability factor predicted for the near-term plasma-based experimental facilities (e.g. FNSF, VNS, CTF), and can have repercussions on tritium economy in DEMO reactors as well, unless significant advancements in RAMI are made. There is a linear dependency between the tritium start-up inventory and the fusion power. The required tritium start-up inventory for a fusion facility of 100 MW fusion power is as small as 1 kg. Since fusion power plants will have large powers for better economics, it is important to maintain a ‘reserve’ tritium inventory in the tritium storage system to continue to fuel the plasma and avoid plant shutdown in case of malfunctions of some parts of the tritium processing lines. But our results show that a reserve time as short as 24 h leads to unacceptable reserve and start-up inventory requirements. Therefore, high reliability and fast maintainability of all components in the fuel cycle are necessary in order to avoid the need for storing reserve tritium inventory sufficient for continued fusion facility operation for more than a few hours. The physics aspects of plasma fueling, tritium burn fraction, and particle and power exhaust are highly interrelated and complex, and predictions for DEMO and power reactors are highly uncertain because of lack of experiments with burning plasma. Fueling by pellet injection on the high field side of tokamak has evolved to be the preferred method to fuel a burning plasma. Extrapolation from the DIII-D penetration scaling shows fueling efficiency expected in DEMO to be <25%, but such extrapolations are highly uncertain. The fueling efficiency of gas in a reactor relevant regime is expected to be extremely poor and not very useful for getting tritium into the core plasma efficiently. Gas fueling will nonetheless be useful for feedback control of the divertor operating parameters. Extensive modeling has been carried out to predict burn fraction, fueling requirements, and fueling efficiency for ITER, DEMO, and beyond. The fueling rate required to operate Q = 10 ITER plasmas in order to provide the required core fueling, helium exhaust and radiative divertor plasma conditions for acceptable divertor power loads was calculated. If this fueling is performed with a 50–50 DT mix, the tritium burn fraction in ITER would be ∼0.36%, which is too low to satisfy the self-sufficiency conditions derived from the dynamics modeling for fusion reactors. Extrapolation to DEMO using this approach would also yield similarly low burn fraction. Extensive analysis presented shows that specific features of edge neutral dynamics in ITER and fusion reactors, which are different from present experiments, open possibilities for optimization of tritium fueling and thus to improve the burn fraction. Using only tritium in pellet fueling of the plasma core, and only deuterium for edge density, divertor power load and ELM control results in significant increase of the burn fraction to 1.8–3.6%. These estimates are performed with physics models whose results cannot be fully validated for ITER and DEMO plasma conditions since these cannot be achieved in present tokamak experiments. Thus, several uncertainties remain regarding particle transport and scenario requirements in ITER and DEMO. The safety standard requirements for protection of the public and release guidelines for tritium have been reviewed. General safety approaches including minimizing tritium inventories, reducing tritium permeation through materials, and decontaminating material for waste disposal have been suggested.

show abstract

Section: Tritium Permeation and Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physics and technology considerations for the deuterium–tritium fuel cycle and conditions for tritium fuel self sufficiency

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lombard (Sakamoto, 2000) 643 966 44,810 −7 59,410 Deming and Handricks (Sakamoto, 2000) 676 1018 39,410 −7 62,130 Borelius and Lindblom (Sakamoto, 2000) 453 823 72,610 −7 57,740 Ham (Sakamoto, 2000) 649 873 46,510 −7 55,310 Smithells and Ransley (Sakamoto, 2000) 521 1023 34,210 −7 50,380 Shcherbakova (Sakamoto, 2000) 623 873 31,810 −7 53,350 Gorman and Nardella (Sakamoto, 2000) 673 1123 36,010 −7 55,230 Belyakov and Ionov (Sakamoto, 2000) 623 873 54,210 −7 53,140 Gel'd (Sakamoto, 2000) 633 1123 75,510 −7 50,210 Fischer (Sakamoto, 2000) 423 996 19,910 −7 52,430 Robertson "best fit" (Robertson, 1973) 297 1333 33,310 −7 54,560 AD Le claire (Le Claire, 1983) 293 1343 33,310 −7 54,598 Desremaux/Laplanche (Desreumaux and Laplanche, 1984) 473 635 34,610 −7 56,106 Altunoglu (Altunoglu et al, 1991) 373 673 33,510 −7 54,240 Kuhn and Johnson (Kuhn and Johnson, 1991) 273 600 59,210 −7 54,900 This work 566 707 1.12 × 10 −7 46,499 sures (9 and 10 bar) at the two highest temperatures tested (683 K and 707 K): in these conditions, where the maximum permeation rate should be reached according to Eq. (4.3), the hydrogen permeation decreases or stalls instead of increasing; no clear explanation was found at this stage, but a possible cause could be attributed to the gas phase polarization effect, becoming important at higher permeation rates and gas pressures (Mourgues and Sanchez, 2005).…”

Section: Referencementioning

confidence: 99%