1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb03284.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Permeation of chromium salts through human skin in vitro

Abstract: Chromium permeation studies were performed on full thickness human skin in diffusion cells. All samples were analysed for the total chromium content by graphite furnace Zeeman-corrected atomic absorption spectrometry. Some samples were analysed by an ion chromatographic method permitting the simultaneous determination of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) as well. The amounts of chromium found in all skin layers were significantly higher when potassium dichromate was applied to the skin compared with chromium chloride or chro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that potassium dichromate was one of the strongest sensitizers (Machovcova et al, 2005;Sharma and Chakrabarti, 1998). Several studies have shown that Cr(VI) can permeate the skin to a larger extent than Cr(III) because of the higher solubility (Gammelgaard et al, 1992;Larese et al, 2007;Van Lierde et al, 2006). Other variables that influence the permeation of Cr through the skin include time of contact, synthetic sweat at low pH and the use of a cleanser (Larese Filon et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that potassium dichromate was one of the strongest sensitizers (Machovcova et al, 2005;Sharma and Chakrabarti, 1998). Several studies have shown that Cr(VI) can permeate the skin to a larger extent than Cr(III) because of the higher solubility (Gammelgaard et al, 1992;Larese et al, 2007;Van Lierde et al, 2006). Other variables that influence the permeation of Cr through the skin include time of contact, synthetic sweat at low pH and the use of a cleanser (Larese Filon et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cr (III) has not been considered to play a significant part in contact allergy because of a low allergenic potency. The penetration of Cr (VI) into the epidermis is much higher than that of Cr III [39]. Back in the 1950s, professionals already recognized that water-soluble Cr was the cause of cement allergy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in allergenic potency between Cr (III) and Cr (VI) is thought partly to be a result of differences in skin permeability. The skin absorption capability of Cr (III) compounds has been demonstrated to be less than that of Cr (VI) compounds [39]. This results in a lower bioavailability of Cr (III) and thereby, a lower allergenicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penetration of chromium VI salts through the skin occurs especially if the skin is damaged (Gammelgaard et al, 1992). Studies with volunteers showed that the reductive capacity of the skin is not sufficient to prevent systemic uptake of chromium VI from locally applied chromium.…”
Section: Occurrence Sources and Use Of Chromium Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%