Perkembangan Regulasi Dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan Online Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat Selama Pandemi Covid-19

Lumbanraja, Anggita Doramia

doi:10.14710/crepido.2.1.46-58

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 3 publications

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Developed country, such as the United States of America, is also inseparable from the issue, although it has been revealed by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that many courts across the state have utilized video conferences for different purposes since 1998 (Lumbanraja, 2020). The fact does not guarantee that there are no regulatory problems, particularly its implementation during a pandemic.…”

Section: Virtual Criminal Trial Regulationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Law Enforcement of Jinayat Cases in Syar’iyah Court in Aceh Province Indonesia During Covid-19 Pandemic

Usman,

Azhari Yahya,

M. Jafar

et al. 2023

UUMJLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to look at the jinayat (criminal) trial both from the regulatory aspect and the application of the rule as a responseto the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study uses two approaches at once, a normative approach to examine thelegality of the regulations and a sociological approach to examine the application of the rule in Syar’iyah courts throughout Aceh. Thisstudy found that the Supreme Court has issued the Supreme Court Regulation known as Perma Number 4 of 2020 as the basic regulation for the implementation of virtual criminal and jinayat trials. There is a diversity of practices that lead to legal uncertainty in the application of Perma at the Aceh Syar’iyah court. There are several Syar’iyah courts that have implemented Perma. However, there are also many Syar’iyah courts that ignore Perma due to unprepared infrastructure. But, there are also some Syar’iyah courts that conduct jinayat trials based on the agreement of the parties involved in the trial. In this case, jinayat trials are sometimes carried out virtually and sometimes physically present in the courtroom. This study also found that the tendency of jinayat cases increased throughout the year 2020 when the pandemic occurred. The increase in jinayat cases was caused by two reasons. First, almost all criminal acts regulated in the qanun of jinayat are domestic crimes. Second, there was a relatively large deduction amount of the budget for the enforcement of Islamic law, which was then reallocated to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

show abstract

Section: Virtual Criminal Trial Regulationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Law Enforcement of Jinayat Cases in Syar’iyah Court in Aceh Province Indonesia During Covid-19 Pandemic

Usman,

Azhari Yahya,

M. Jafar

et al. 2023

UUMJLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The CARES Act is a legal instrument that applies electronic media such as teleconferences to conduct trials of certain cases in court. This makes during the emergency period the US Supreme Court is abolished for a certain period (Lumbanraja, 2020). Some of the problems faced and encountered in implementing the CARES Act are similar to the practice of electronic courts in Indonesia.…”

Section: Electronic Criminal Court Reformulation To Ensure Legal Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electronic Criminal Trial Reform That Guarantees Due Process Of Law

YULIANTO¹,

Sugiri²

2022

IJESSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines how the reformulation of electronic criminal trials in Indonesia ensures the correct legal process. The research approach used is normative juridical law research, namely by analyzing several primary kinds of literature such as legislation, and legal theory to the views of scholars. The results obtained from this study are that Indonesia as a state of law certainly in its judicial system must obey the law. Indonesia is currently trying to impose electronic trials in resolving several cases in court through the use of electronic media such as teleconferences. This activity is based on the legislation governing electronic criminal trials such as PERMA Number 1 of 2019, PERMA Number 4 of 2020, the Criminal Code, and other related regulations. This regulation forms the basis for the implementation of electronic trials in Indonesia with the main objective of creating fast, simple, and inexpensive trials. However, the facts on the ground show that the problems that occur related to the implementation of this activity are not only technical problems or facilities and infrastructure but also public doubts about the quality of the results of the trial. This phenomenon also occurs in several countries that enforce electronic courts, such as the United States and the Netherlands. Therefore, there is a need for reformulation of statements in legislation so that it does not only focus on the goal of creating a fast, simple and inexpensive judiciary but also needs to be emphasized to ensure the proper legal process occurs.

show abstract

“…Sebagaimana diketahui e-litigasi menggunakan aplikasi 16 Ibid., p.329 17 Suyudi, Aria et al (2010) teleconference yang mana terdakwa hanya dihadirkan melalui video bukan dihadirkan langsung pada persidangan. 23 Pada tanggal 17 Februari 2021, Mahkamah Agung memberikan laporan bahwa sepanjang tahun 2020 total kasus yang masuk pada e-Court adalah 186.987 kasus, namun kasus yang diselesaikan melalui e-litigasi hanya 8.560 kasus atau sekitar 4,58% saja dari keseluruhan kasus yang masuk. 24 Data ini menunjukkan bahwa e-Litigasi belum akrab dalam masyarakat karena minimnya penyelesaian melalui e-Litigasi itu sendiri.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Perkembangan Regulasi dan Urgensi E-Litigasi Di Era Pandemi Corona Virus Disease -19

Sriwidodo

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pelaksanaan e-Litigasi saat pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia masih menimbulkan beberapa isu, mulai dari isu disharmonisasi hukum, hingga belum akrabnya masyarakat Indonesia akan penggunaan e-Litigasi. Namun terlepas dari isu tersebut, proses peradilan tetap harus berjalan mengingat penegakan hukum harus terus dilakukan demi tercapainya keadilan. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, maka permasalahan yang akan dibahas pada penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana perkembangan regulasi penyelesaian perkara saat Pandemi Covid-19 dan bagaimana urgensi e-Litigasi saat Pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Upaya penyelesaian perkara saat Pandemi Covid-19 telah dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia baik dilakukan upaya melalui jalur litigasi maupun melalui jalur non-litigasi. Adapun upaya penyelesaian perkara melalui jalur non-litigasi telah diterapkan oleh Lembaga Kejaksaan dengan terbentuknya Peraturan Kejaksaan RI (PERJA). Sedangkan upaya penegak hukum dalam penyelesaian perkara saat Pandemi Covid-19 melalui jalur litigasi yaitu dengan adanya e-Litigasi. Diperlukannya keberadaan E-Litigasi saat Pandemi Covid-19 seperti saat ini yaitu karena proses e-Litigasi yang memenuhi asas cepat, sederhana dan murah. Meskipun dalam pelaksanaan e-Litigasi terdapat beberapa kelemahan pada unsur hukum yakni substansi hukum dan budaya hukum. Terkait permasalahan substansi hukum, permasalahan tersebut dapat diselesaikan dengan adanya perumusan peraturan yang lebih mapan terkait e-Litigasi ataupun dapat dilakukan dengan merevisi KUHAP. Sedangkan permasalahan budaya hukum, dapat diselesaikan dengan ketersediaan fasilitas dan sumber daya manusia yang memadai, keterbukaan informasi lengkap yang mudah diakses, ketersediaan budget untuk memenuhi keperluan, serta metode pengambilan keputusan.

show abstract

Perkembangan Regulasi Dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan Online Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat Selama Pandemi Covid-19

Cited by 9 publications

References 3 publications

Law Enforcement of Jinayat Cases in Syar’iyah Court in Aceh Province Indonesia During Covid-19 Pandemic

Law Enforcement of Jinayat Cases in Syar’iyah Court in Aceh Province Indonesia During Covid-19 Pandemic

Electronic Criminal Trial Reform That Guarantees Due Process Of Law

Perkembangan Regulasi dan Urgensi E-Litigasi Di Era Pandemi Corona Virus Disease -19

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About