Background:
The US government has implemented incentives to increase the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Successful placement of PD catheters is an important step to increasing PD utilization rates. Our objective was to compare initial outcomes after PD catheter placement by different types of operators.
Methods:
We included PD-naïve patients insured by Medicare who had a PD catheter inserted between 2010-2019. We examined the association between specialty of the operator (general surgeon, vascular surgeon, interventional radiologist, or interventional nephrologist) and odds of needing a follow-up procedure, which we defined as catheter removal, replacement, or revision within 90 days of the initial procedure. Mixed logistic regression models clustered by operator were used to examine the association between operator type and outcomes.
Results:
We included 46,973 patients treated by 5,205 operators (71.1% general surgeons, 17.2% vascular surgeons, 9.7% interventional radiologists, 2.0% interventional nephrologists). 15.5% of patients required a follow-up procedure within 90 days of the initial insertion, of whom 2.9% had a second PD catheter implanted, 6.6% underwent PD catheter removal, and 5.9% had a PD catheter revision within 90 days of the initial insertion. In models adjusted for patient and operator characteristics, the odds of requiring a follow-up procedure within 90 days were highest for interventional nephrologists (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.56-2.22) and interventional radiologists (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.17-1.58) followed by vascular surgeons (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.97-1.14) compared with general surgeons.
Conclusions:
The probability of needing a follow-up procedure after initial PD catheter placement varied by operator specialty and was higher for interventionalists and lowest for general surgeons.