2000
DOI: 10.2307/1468282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periphyton production on wood and sediment: substratum-specific response to laboratory and whole-lake nutrient manipulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(82 reference statements)
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, many studies have identified differences between pelagic and littoral habitats with respect to both primary and secondary production (Lindeman 1942;Wetzel 1995;Vadeboncoeur et al 2002). Within littoral zones, patchiness of benthic substrate types may drive spatial heterogeneity in rates of metabolism (Vadeboncoeur and Lodge 2000;Lauster et al 2006;Vadeboncoeur et al 2006). In pelagic zones, studies have shown that even moderate physical forcing can create patches of differing nutrient concentrations and abundances of producers and consumers (Caron et al 2008;Blukacz et al 2010;Mackay et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, many studies have identified differences between pelagic and littoral habitats with respect to both primary and secondary production (Lindeman 1942;Wetzel 1995;Vadeboncoeur et al 2002). Within littoral zones, patchiness of benthic substrate types may drive spatial heterogeneity in rates of metabolism (Vadeboncoeur and Lodge 2000;Lauster et al 2006;Vadeboncoeur et al 2006). In pelagic zones, studies have shown that even moderate physical forcing can create patches of differing nutrient concentrations and abundances of producers and consumers (Caron et al 2008;Blukacz et al 2010;Mackay et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most measurements of whole-lake benthic and pelagic primary production date back to the International Biosphere Program of the 1960s and 1970s. Unfortunately, these studies used a wide variety of methods and lack the accompanying phosphorus data needed to compare phytoplankton and periphyton responses to nutrient enrichment (summarized in Westlake et al [1980] and Vadeboncoeur and Steinman [2002]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have confirmed that the biomass of periphyton is positively correlated with total phosphorus (TP) concentration in water [7][8][9]. However, some studies indicate that enrichment concentrations may have little or negative effect on periphyton biomass [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some studies indicate that enrichment concentrations may have little or negative effect on periphyton biomass [10][11][12]. For example, P fertilization did not cause any increase in epipelic production both in laboratory and actual lake conditions [9,13]. Even in large scale, losses of periphyton also occurred due to excessive P enrichment [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%