Abstract:validity of current animal studies, high quality experimental studies and efforts for effective translation from preclinical studies to clinical trials are still required. The present study also demonstrates that moderate confidence could be placed in safety of MSCs therapy for knee OA but with low confidence in efficacy outcomes due to limitations of the current evidence. Further high-quality studies with high internal and external validity are still required.
“…Nineteen studies including 584 knee OA patients (352 cases for MSC group and 232 cases for control group) fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis ( Figure 1 ). Eighteen publications were full-text articles [ [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , 21 , 23 ], and one publication was conference abstract [ 6 ]. …”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of included studies are shown in Table 1 . Among the included studies, there were 15 RCTs [ 3 , 5 , 6 , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , 18 , 19 , 21 , 23 ], two retrospective studies [ 1 , 17 ] and two cohort studies [ 4 , 16 ]. All the 19 papers were fully published during the period from 2012 to 2019.…”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size ranged from a minimum of nine to a maximum of 60 patients. In all the trials, MSC therapy was evaluated in knee OA patients with MSCs from fat in nine studies [ 1 , 4 , 8 , 13 , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] ], MSCs from marrow in five studies [ 3 , [9] , [10] , [11] , 14 ], peripheral blood stem cells in one study reported in a conference paper [ 21 ], and MSCs from foetus in four studies [ 5 , 6 , 12 , 23 ]. The patients received cell infusions from 1.89 × 10 6 to 100 × 10 6 cells.…”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2019 20 (11/9) 10 (5/5) 54.6/51.5 31.6 RCT WOMAC 12 Fat ROB 95.1–103.9 MSCs/NS [ 19 ] Khasru et al. 2019 15 15 53 ± 11 — RCT WOMAC, VAS 6 Blood ROB — MSCs [ 21 ] Matas et al. 2019 20 (9/11) 9 (4/5) 56.1 ± 6.8/54.8 ± 4.5 27.6 RCT WOMAC, VAS, SF-36 12 Foetus ROB 20 MSCs/NS/HA [ 23 ] BMI = body mass index; CS = cohort study; HA = hyaluronic acid; KOA = knee osteoarthritis; KOOS = knee osteoarthritis outcome score; MSCs = mesenchymal stem cells; NOS = Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; NS = normal saline; PRP = platelet-rich plasma; R = retrospective; RCT = randomized controlled trial; ROB = The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias; RP = retrospective design, prospective data collection; SF-36 = short form–36 health survey; VAS = visual analog scale; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.…”
Summary
Stem cells are considered to be one of the greatest potential treatments to cure degenerative diseases. Stem cells injection for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is still a relatively new treatment and has not yet gained popularity. So, the effectiveness, safety and potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for knee OA treatment is worthy to be explored. Explore the effectiveness and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. We collected clinical trials using MSCs as treatment for knee OA (before April 2019), including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective studies and cohort studies. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and the ClinicalTrials.gov with keywords (Mesenchymal stem cells [MSCs], Knee osteoarthritis, Effectiveness and Safety), and then performed a systematic review and cumulative metaanalysis of all RCTs and retrospective comparative studies. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of MSC in knee OA treatment, we applied visual analog scale score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteo-arthritis Index and adverse events. We included 15 RCTs, two retrospective studies and two cohort studies including a total of 584 knee OA patients in this study. We demonstrated that MSC treatment could significantly decrease visual analog scale in a 12-month follow-up study compared with controls (p < 0.001). MSC therapy also showed significant decreases in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores after the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.001). MSC therapy showed no difference compared with controls (p > 0.05) in adverse events. We suggest that MSC therapy could serve as an effective and safe therapy for clinical application in OA treatment.
The translational potential of this article
This study provided the best available evidence and a wider perspective to MSCs application in the management of knee OA. MSCs therapy will have great translational potential in the clinical treatment of various degenerative diseases once optimum formula and explicit target population are identified.
“…Nineteen studies including 584 knee OA patients (352 cases for MSC group and 232 cases for control group) fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis ( Figure 1 ). Eighteen publications were full-text articles [ [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , 21 , 23 ], and one publication was conference abstract [ 6 ]. …”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of included studies are shown in Table 1 . Among the included studies, there were 15 RCTs [ 3 , 5 , 6 , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , 18 , 19 , 21 , 23 ], two retrospective studies [ 1 , 17 ] and two cohort studies [ 4 , 16 ]. All the 19 papers were fully published during the period from 2012 to 2019.…”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size ranged from a minimum of nine to a maximum of 60 patients. In all the trials, MSC therapy was evaluated in knee OA patients with MSCs from fat in nine studies [ 1 , 4 , 8 , 13 , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] ], MSCs from marrow in five studies [ 3 , [9] , [10] , [11] , 14 ], peripheral blood stem cells in one study reported in a conference paper [ 21 ], and MSCs from foetus in four studies [ 5 , 6 , 12 , 23 ]. The patients received cell infusions from 1.89 × 10 6 to 100 × 10 6 cells.…”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2019 20 (11/9) 10 (5/5) 54.6/51.5 31.6 RCT WOMAC 12 Fat ROB 95.1–103.9 MSCs/NS [ 19 ] Khasru et al. 2019 15 15 53 ± 11 — RCT WOMAC, VAS 6 Blood ROB — MSCs [ 21 ] Matas et al. 2019 20 (9/11) 9 (4/5) 56.1 ± 6.8/54.8 ± 4.5 27.6 RCT WOMAC, VAS, SF-36 12 Foetus ROB 20 MSCs/NS/HA [ 23 ] BMI = body mass index; CS = cohort study; HA = hyaluronic acid; KOA = knee osteoarthritis; KOOS = knee osteoarthritis outcome score; MSCs = mesenchymal stem cells; NOS = Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; NS = normal saline; PRP = platelet-rich plasma; R = retrospective; RCT = randomized controlled trial; ROB = The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias; RP = retrospective design, prospective data collection; SF-36 = short form–36 health survey; VAS = visual analog scale; WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.…”
Summary
Stem cells are considered to be one of the greatest potential treatments to cure degenerative diseases. Stem cells injection for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is still a relatively new treatment and has not yet gained popularity. So, the effectiveness, safety and potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for knee OA treatment is worthy to be explored. Explore the effectiveness and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. We collected clinical trials using MSCs as treatment for knee OA (before April 2019), including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective studies and cohort studies. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and the ClinicalTrials.gov with keywords (Mesenchymal stem cells [MSCs], Knee osteoarthritis, Effectiveness and Safety), and then performed a systematic review and cumulative metaanalysis of all RCTs and retrospective comparative studies. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of MSC in knee OA treatment, we applied visual analog scale score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteo-arthritis Index and adverse events. We included 15 RCTs, two retrospective studies and two cohort studies including a total of 584 knee OA patients in this study. We demonstrated that MSC treatment could significantly decrease visual analog scale in a 12-month follow-up study compared with controls (p < 0.001). MSC therapy also showed significant decreases in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores after the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.001). MSC therapy showed no difference compared with controls (p > 0.05) in adverse events. We suggest that MSC therapy could serve as an effective and safe therapy for clinical application in OA treatment.
The translational potential of this article
This study provided the best available evidence and a wider perspective to MSCs application in the management of knee OA. MSCs therapy will have great translational potential in the clinical treatment of various degenerative diseases once optimum formula and explicit target population are identified.
“…A recent review article established the use of PBMSCs in cartilage repair and regeneration to be very safe and efficacious (94). In phase II clinical trial on the use of PBSCs in an arthritic knee, it was found that these cells increase the mean cartilage thickness and improve the quality of life (95).…”
The large economic burden on the global health care systems is due to the increasing number of symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) knee patients whereby accounting for greater morbidity and impaired functional quality of life. The recent developments and impulses in molecular and regenerative medicine have paved the way for inducing the biological active cells such as stem cells, bioactive materials, and growth factors towards the healing and tissue regenerative process. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) act as a minimally invasive procedure that bridges the gap between pharmacological treatment and surgical treatment for OA. MSCs are the ideal cell-based therapy for treating disorders under a minimally invasive environment in conjunction with cartilage regeneration. Due to the worldwide recognized animal model for such cell-based therapies, global researchers have started using the various sources of MSCs towards cartilage regeneration. However, there is a lacuna in literature on the comparative efficacy and safety of various sources of MSCs in OA of the knee. Hence, the identification of a potential source for therapeutic use in this clinical scenario remains unclear. In this article, we compared the therapeutic effects of various sources of MSCs in terms of efficacy, safety, differentiation potential, durability, accessibility, allogenic preparation and culture expandability to decide the optimal source of MSCs for OA knee
Background: Clinical guidelines need high-quality studies to support clinical decision-making, in which the evidence often was collected from systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses (MAs). At present, the methodological quality and risk of bias (RoB) of SRs/MAs on stem cell therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has been poorly investigated. This study aims to strictly evaluate the methodological quality and RoB in SRs/MAs of stem cell therapy for KOA.Methods: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases) were searched, from inception to October 5th, 2021. SRs/MAs involving RCTs or cohort studies on stem cell therapy for the treatment of KOA were included. The methodological quality and RoB were assessed using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tool respectively.Results: In total, 22 SRs/MAs were included. According to the results obtained by AMSTAR 2 tool, all SRs/MAs were rated as "Critically low". Main methodological weaknesses were as follows: eight items accounted for more than 50% of "No", including Items 2 Protocol registration (81.82%), Item 7 Study exclusion and justi cation (86.36%) and Item 15 Investigation and discussion of publication bias (63.64%) were critical items. ROBIS-based RoB assessment showed that all the SRs/MAs were rated as "High".
Conclusions:The overall methodological quality of the SRs/MAs concerning the application of stem cell therapy in treating KOA is "Critically low", while the RoB is high. It is di cult to provide effective evidence for the formulation of guidelines for KOA treatment. We suggest that the relevant methodological quality assessment should be carried out in the future before the SRs/MAs are used as clinical evidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.