“… Authors/Year | Patient age (years) and sex | Site of the tumor | Infiltration of the tumor | Management | Comment |
Schecter et al, 1982 [ 4 ] | 23, F | Middle finger | No | Ray amputation | Lesion appeared during pregnancy. Amputation done because of suspected sarcoma |
Schecter et al, 1982 [ 4 ] | 25, F | Middle finger | No | Excision | Lesion appeared during pregnancy |
De Smet and Vercauteren, 1984 [ 5 ] | 58, F | Middle finger | No | Ray amputation | Amputation done because of suspected sarcoma |
Patel and Desai, 1986 [ 6 ] | 35, F | Little finger | Extensor tendon | Ray amputation | Amputation done because of tendon involvement and suspected sarcoma |
Kai et al, 1987 [ 7 ] | 35, M | Second web space | No | Excision | Failed initial conservative management |
De Smet et al, 1994 [ 8 ] | 27, M | Near the head of the second metacarpal | No | Excision | Bone scan showed increased uptake of the adjacent second metacarpal |
De Smet et al, 1994 [ 8 ] | 42, M | Middle finger | No | Excision | Periosteal reaction of the adjacent middle phalanx |
|
…”