2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c10615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periosteum-Inspired Membranes Integrated with Bioactive Magnesium Oxychloride Ceramic Nanoneedles for Guided Bone Regeneration

Abstract: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique using a barrier membrane holds great potential to allow the single-stage reconstruction of critical-sized bone defects. Here, bioactive nanoneedle-like magnesium oxychloride ceramics (MOCs) are synthesized and recruited as an osteoinductive factor within a polycaprolactone-gelatin A (PCL-GelA) membranous matrix to generate a periosteum-mimicking biphasic GBR membrane (PCL-GelA/MOC) to accelerate calvarial defect repair. The PCL-GelA/MOC membrane acts as a shield for def… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we assessed the expression of angiogenic marker (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)) and tube formation ability of the membrane (Figure 5G), as new blood vessels work as a bridge linking fresh tissue and original tissue. [ 42 ] The AR5‐ group showed significantly higher expression of OCN and Osterix than the Ctrl‐ and AR0‐ groups (Figure 5H, p < 0.05). With the help of PTT, the levels of almost all involved osteogenic and angiogenic markers are up‐regulated in the AR5+ group compared to the AR5‐ group ( p < 0.05) (Figure 5H–J).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we assessed the expression of angiogenic marker (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)) and tube formation ability of the membrane (Figure 5G), as new blood vessels work as a bridge linking fresh tissue and original tissue. [ 42 ] The AR5‐ group showed significantly higher expression of OCN and Osterix than the Ctrl‐ and AR0‐ groups (Figure 5H, p < 0.05). With the help of PTT, the levels of almost all involved osteogenic and angiogenic markers are up‐regulated in the AR5+ group compared to the AR5‐ group ( p < 0.05) (Figure 5H–J).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] Considering that alveolar bone loss can often occur in the context of periodontitis or tooth-replacement procedure, many studies have devoted to regenerating the defective bony tissues (Table 1). [15,[31][32][33][34][35] To endow the membrane with additional osteo-promotive properties, therapeutic additives would further be incorporated, like bioceramics (e.g., magnesium-containing bioceramics, hydroxyapatite and calcium phosphate) or growth factors (e.g., bone morphogenic proteins). Recently, our group has reported an asymmetric periosteum-mimicking guided bone regeneration (GBR) membrane through a two-step electrospinning procedure, whereby the blend of polycaprolactone (PCL) and gelatin A (GelA) was the membrane matrix and the magnesium oxychloride ceramic (MOC) nanoneedle was the deliverable osteoinductive factor.…”
Section: Biphasic/bilayer Gtr Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioceramics have been proved to be capable of steadily releasing various metal ions, including Sr 2+ , Cu 2+ , Ca 2+ , and Mg 2+ . 83,264–266 Notably, the controversial Fe 3+ has demonstrated advantageous effects when incorporated into bioceramics. Ullah et al 267 used modified bioceramics with Sr 2+ and Fe 3+ , demonstrating excellent biocompatibility and a favorable microenvironment for bone regeneration.…”
Section: Metal Ion-based Biomaterials For Bone Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%