2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative chemotherapy for bladder cancer in the general population: Are practice patterns finally changing?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peri-operative chemotherapy offers additional benefit in disease free interval and overall survival ( 2 ), however utilization rates continue to be relatively low worldwide. The study by Booth et al is a large population-based analysis of time trends in use of peri-operative chemotherapy for MIBC in Ontario, Canada ( 3 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Peri-operative chemotherapy offers additional benefit in disease free interval and overall survival ( 2 ), however utilization rates continue to be relatively low worldwide. The study by Booth et al is a large population-based analysis of time trends in use of peri-operative chemotherapy for MIBC in Ontario, Canada ( 3 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the controversy regarding the timing of chemotherapy in relation to cystectomy, other factors that may limit its usage include patient fitness and preferences as well as clinician preferences. In an effort to understand these factors further, Booth et al conducted a retrospective analysis of 5,582 cystectomy patients treated in Ontario over a 20-year period from 1994–2013 ( 3 ). Such a substantial collection of data allows for comprehensive analysis of practice patterns in the field of MIBC treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing rates of use of CHT is consistent with other studies that examined the same topic. For example, Booth et al 17…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential reasons include patient ineligibility related to renal dysfunction, toxicity of NAC, delay in performing RC, patient preference against chemotherapy, and probably most importantly low propensity of urologists and medical oncologists to use NAC. After many years of practice lagging behind evidence, more recent surveys suggest that the use of NAC has been increasing worldwide during the 2010s ( 3 - 6 ). However, it remains clear that not all patients who are likely to benefit from NAC receive it, suggesting that continuous efforts are required to convince more urologists and oncologists to use it.…”
Section: From Clinical Trials To Daily Practice: An Ever-present Needmentioning
confidence: 99%