2018
DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.06.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refining the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer: from conviction to optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the pivotal randomized studies and meta-analyses demonstrating the survival benefit of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy before cystectomy [7,8], low implementation of this approach was observed in daily practice [9][10][11][12]. The objective of the French GETUG/AFU V05 Vesper phase III trial was to compare the efficacy of six cycles of dd-MVAC or four cycles of GC regimens (3 mo of chemotherapy) in terms of PFS in patients for whom chemotherapy has been decided, before or after radical cystectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the pivotal randomized studies and meta-analyses demonstrating the survival benefit of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy before cystectomy [7,8], low implementation of this approach was observed in daily practice [9][10][11][12]. The objective of the French GETUG/AFU V05 Vesper phase III trial was to compare the efficacy of six cycles of dd-MVAC or four cycles of GC regimens (3 mo of chemotherapy) in terms of PFS in patients for whom chemotherapy has been decided, before or after radical cystectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 The oncologic challenge was to refine the use of NAC with less toxic regimens for optimization in the perioperative setting. 17,18…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 The oncologic challenge was to refine the use of NAC with less toxic regimens for optimization in the perioperative setting. 17,18 Several retrospective studies reported divergent results regarding the relative efficacy of both regimens in the neoadjuvant setting. Van de Putte et al 19 investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant induction dd-MVAC with similar pathologic response and higher toxicity than GC chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%