The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62660-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perioperative Allogeneic Blood Transfusion Does Not Cause Adverse Sequelae in Patients With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Unconfounded Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 There was also agreement among the findings of these RCTs (Figure 3), as the noted variation in reported results was sufficiently modest to be attributed to chance (P Ͼ .10 for the Q test statistic). 55 Accordingly, the findings of the studies were combined in 2 meta-analyses, 24,25 and the summary OR of cancer recurrence in the allogeneic transfusion (compared with the control) group across the 3 studies was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.81-1.35; P Ͼ .05) (Figure 3). The summary OR of death due to cancer recurrence was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.76-1.26; P Ͼ .05).…”
Section: Randomized Controlled Trials Cancer Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…22 There was also agreement among the findings of these RCTs (Figure 3), as the noted variation in reported results was sufficiently modest to be attributed to chance (P Ͼ .10 for the Q test statistic). 55 Accordingly, the findings of the studies were combined in 2 meta-analyses, 24,25 and the summary OR of cancer recurrence in the allogeneic transfusion (compared with the control) group across the 3 studies was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.81-1.35; P Ͼ .05) (Figure 3). The summary OR of death due to cancer recurrence was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.76-1.26; P Ͼ .05).…”
Section: Randomized Controlled Trials Cancer Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Jensen et al 3,5 did not present information on some important potential confounding variables (eg, Dukes stage of tumor and tumor fixation to adjacent organs), allowing one to speculate that the observed large TRIM effect (Figure 4) could be due to the effects of uncontrolled confounding factors. 24,25 In addition, selection bias and observation bias are possible in RCTs despite the randomized design and the blinding of investigators, respectively. 94,95 In the RCTs of Jensen et al, 3,5 sicker patients may have been systematically allocated to the treatment arm, and/or investigators who became aware of the treatment allocations may have been inclined to diagnose postoperative infection more often in patients from the treatment arm.…”
Section: Postoperative Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these studies have shown an adverse effect of transfusion on the prognosis of patients with colorectal carcinoma [4][5][6]. Conversely, others have found no transfusion-dependent effect on survival and recurrence [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomized control trials using both leucodepleted blood and autologous blood have not demonstrated an increase in either the risk of cancer or infection (Goodnough 2000;Jensen 1998). A meta-analysis of three randomized control trials and two cohort studies where control groups received either leucodepleted blood or autologous transfusion found no significant differences in cancer recurrence (McAlister 1998).…”
Section: Immunomodulationmentioning
confidence: 99%