Periodization and Programming in Sports

Fisher, James; Csapo, Robert

doi:10.3390/sports9020013

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This issue is well known that for the success of athletes, resistance training should be included, based on special strategies, in athletes' annual plans aimed at improving physical factors and minimizing overtraining through. These strategies can be referred to as athletes' training periodization that are important for progress, development and break the training plateau (Arazi, Khoshnoud, Asadi, & Tufano, 2021;Fisher & Csapo, 2021;Gavanda, Geisler, Quittmann, & Schiffer, 2019). The first and most common periodization developed for the training of athletes was the traditional periodization, also known as linear periodization in Western literature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of 8 weeks of block and traditional periodization training models on practical factors in volleyball players

Tavakkoli

Abbaspoor

Nikooie

2022

sci. j. sport perform.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 8 weeks of traditional and block periodization training models on practical factors in volleyball players. 13 male volleyball players (mean ± SD; age: 17 ± 0.70 years; body mass: 68 ± 12.13 kg; stature: 181 ± 17.13; BMI: 20 ± 3.03) from the same team were divided in two groups (BP: 6; TP: 7). The subjects performed 3 training sessions in volleyball court per week for 8 weeks. The subjects implemented 3 testing stages (before starting, mid and after 8 weeks) including Vertical Jump, Illinois, Pro-agility and T Agility Tests, Shuttle run 300-yard, Side jumps in 60 second and, finally, Hand grip. Between-group changes were assessed using repeated measure analysis. There were not significant differences between group-time interaction effect, in Vertical jump (p ˃ .05), Agility time (p ˃ .05), Power endurance (p ˃ .05) and Special aerobic endurance (p ˃ .05). This means that there were not significant differences between the groups in improving practical training factors; but Time effect was significant (p ˂ .05). In addition, Block periodization showed higher means in the strength of arm and forearm at the end of protocol.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%