2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-016-2719-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodicity analysis of galactic cosmic rays using Fourier, Hilbert, and higher-order spectral methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second peak, probably related with solar rotation, is centered in 13.5 days. The 13.5-day period (the second harmonic of the fundamental solar rotation) has been associated with both solar active longitudes as well as tilted dipole structure (Vipindas et al 2016). This period presents higher power between 2014 and 2017 (figure 2) and it is especially strong in the second half of 2016 during the decreasing phase of the Solar Cycle.…”
Section: Global Neutron Monitormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second peak, probably related with solar rotation, is centered in 13.5 days. The 13.5-day period (the second harmonic of the fundamental solar rotation) has been associated with both solar active longitudes as well as tilted dipole structure (Vipindas et al 2016). This period presents higher power between 2014 and 2017 (figure 2) and it is especially strong in the second half of 2016 during the decreasing phase of the Solar Cycle.…”
Section: Global Neutron Monitormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incomplete knowledge of processes in near-Earth space and their interaction significantly complicates the process of constructing models and methods for analysing data from neutron monitors. The applied classical methods [6][7][8] make it possible to single out stable characteristics of the data, but are not effective enough for studying non-stationary changes in cosmic ray variations. Modern methods [9] make it possible to determine the main characteristics of the dynamics of the cosmic ray flux with acceptable accuracy, but they require complex computational calculations, as a result of which they are not automated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, there are no models and methods capable to analyze the data of neutron monitors on-line and with sufficient accuracy. The classical methods used [9][10][11][12] are poorly adaptable to the changing of complex non-stationary structure of neutron monitor data, as a result of which they are ineffective for studying anomalous processes in the dynamics of cosmic rays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%