1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.57.4579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic lattice distortion accompanying the(3×3)charge-density-wave phase of Sn/Ge(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
27
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar phenomenology has been observed for Sn͞Ge(111) [4,5]. A structural study for this interface [6] found no significant rippling in the Sn layer and attributed the 3 3 3 phase to lateral atomic displacements in the first Ge layer.…”
Section: (Received 2 October 1998)supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar phenomenology has been observed for Sn͞Ge(111) [4,5]. A structural study for this interface [6] found no significant rippling in the Sn layer and attributed the 3 3 3 phase to lateral atomic displacements in the first Ge layer.…”
Section: (Received 2 October 1998)supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Core-level photoemission for Sn͞Ge(111) indicates the existence of two kinds of Sn atoms in the 3 3 3 phase [8,9]. All these experiments could be interpreted assuming a corrugated Sn or Pb layer, but this idea disagrees with the structural model found by Baddorf et al [6] for Sn͞Ge(111).…”
Section: (Received 2 October 1998)mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The results of a Keating energy minimization are incompatible with the smaller value so we are forced to conclude that the analysis presented in Ref. [8] is incorrect. As shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1. To add to the confusion the postulated Sn atom displacement in the (3×3) structure was not found in a recent surface x-ray diffraction (SXRD) study [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation